跳到正文
@emollick· @emollick · X·· 19 天前AI 评分22
AI 导读

Ethan Mollick 对一份称 AI 理财建议表现不佳的报告提出质疑,认为其与其他近期研究结论矛盾,且报告出自一家销售 AI 金融服务产品的公司。他下载报告后发现其中问题示例有限,无法判断准确性,并询问熟悉英国税法的人:GPT-6 Pro 为 Haiku 答案的辩护是否正确,还是 Saturn 的批评成立。

正文

I think there are lots of good reasons to worry about whether AI is giving correct answers (especially free models), but, given the contradiction with other recent research suggesting AI is now doing well at financial advice, I was curious about what the methodology was here. I downloaded the report, which is from a company selling different AI financial services products.

Given the limited information in the report, it is impossible to judge it's accuracy, since there are only limited examples of questions. However, I am curious if anyone familiar with UK tax law knows whether GPT-6 Pro's defense of Haiku's answer is right, or if Saturn's critique is.

来源:@emollick · x.com