MIT 一篇新论文提出可自我修订的 AI 科学家框架,让系统不只探索固定的科学词汇表,还能在现有变量、工具、验证器和模型结构不够用时扩展词汇表本身。该框架把证据、工具、产物、验证器、失败与主张变成带类型的溯源,并区分检索、搜索与"发现"三种模式,其中发现被定义为可验证的 schema 扩展。
AI scientists may be moving from search to real discovery.
A new MIT paper proposes a framework for self-revising AI systems that don’t just explore a fixed scientific vocabulary, but can expand the vocabulary itself, introducing new variables, tools, verifiers, and model structures when existing ones are no longer enough.
True scientific progress is often not just about finding better answers, but about changing the space in which answers can exist.
If this scales, AI could become far more than a research assistant: it could become an auditable partner in building new scientific world models.
Still early, but conceptually very exciting.
We've made a breakthrough in self-evolving AI scientists moving from "search" to "principled discovery": Scientific discovery requires that the search space itself changes, and an AI scientist must perceive this shift without intervention. We built an AI that achieves this for the first time with the ability to discover the scientific vocabulary it reasons in. Evidence, tools, artifacts, verifiers, failures & claims become typed provenance. We show three distinct modalities: 1) retrieval, adding known objects; 2) search, exploring a fixed schema; and critically: 3) discovery, a verified regime transition. We solve the open-endedness evaluation problem by lifting agentic workflows into a typed copresheaf and proving, via a Kan obstruction, that true discovery is not unbounded generation but a verifiable schema expansion: old evidence is transported by Left Kan extension, and genuine novelty is mathematically quantified by the pointwise residual beyond the transported image - separating discovery from mere search and making novelty objective and measurable rather than a subjective judgment or benchmark delta. Our AI scientist is built in a way that does not pre-conceive the approach it chooses; instead, we endow the system with formal power to adapt, evolve, and reason from first principles. Case studies include: 1⃣Builder/Breaker model that discovers mode-conditioned compliance in proteins; 2⃣CategoryScienceClaw that finds anisotropic fiber-network stiffness rules. Great work in collaboration with my graduate student @fwang108_ @MITdeptofBE F.Y. Wang & M.J. Buehler, Self-Revising Discovery Systems for Science: A Categorical Framework for Agentic Artificial Intelligence, arXiv:2606.01444, 2026 Video在 X 查看被引用的帖子
来源:@kimmonismus · x.com