Kim 批评欧盟委员会将 ChatGPT Search 规模大到需受额外监管当作成绩宣传,而欧洲自身未能建出可比产品。他强调自己从未称欧盟规则比中国更严,指出用中国做对比是 whataboutism,改变不了这一批评。他生活在欧洲,欧盟政策直接影响他,若不同意应针对他实际提出的论点。
Unfortunately, this is how some defenders of EU regulation respond to criticism: with a straw man and whataboutism instead of engaging with the actual argument.
I never claimed that EU rules are stricter than China’s. I criticized the absurdity of the EU Commission highlighting that ChatGPT Search is now large enough to face additional regulation, while Europe has failed to build anything comparable.
Pointing to China changes absolutely nothing about that criticism. I live in Europe, so EU policy directly affects me. I criticize China too, but China wasn’t the subject.
If you disagree, address the argument I actually made, not an easier one you invented.
来源:@kimmonismus · x.com