跳到正文
@kimmonismus· @kimmonismus · X·· 2026-08-31AI 评分62
AI 导读

Anthropic 因 Claude Max 的用量倍数宣传在六月面临拟议集体诉讼,指控称 200 美元 Max 20x 档的周用量约为 100 美元 Max 5x 档的两倍。诉讼文件估算 Max 5x 约为 Pro 周用量的 3.5 倍、Max 20x 为 6–8 倍。作者指出 20x 倍率只在每 5 小时窗口内成立,单独计算的周上限 Anthropic 并未公布,定价页文案也因此容易让人误读。

正文

I went down the rabbit hole: Anthropic is already being sued over exactly this. And the $200 plan really only provides only around 2x the weekly usage of the $100 plan

Here is where the confusion comes from.

Anthropic’s pricing page says: “Choose 5x or 20x more usage than Pro.”

That naturally makes the $200 Max 20x plan sound like it includes four times the usage of the $100 Max 5x plan.

Only further down does Anthropic clarify: “Max gives you 5x or 20x more usage per 5-hour session than Pro.”

Those multipliers do not apply to the separate weekly caps, whose exact size Anthropic does not disclose.

A proposed class action filed in June alleges that Max 5x delivers around 3.5x Pro’s weekly usage, while Max 20x delivers just 6–8x. In practice, the $200 plan therefore provides only around 2x the weekly usage of the $100 plan, sometimes even less depending on the model.

The “20x” is real within each five-hour window. The weekly limit makes the overall offer look very different.

h/t @Hesamation for finding the original court files first i think

引用@kimmonismus@kimmonismus
Today I learned : Claude’s $200 Max plan offers 20x Pro usage within the five-hour window, but its weekly limit is only about twice that of the $100 plan. Oh and btw: Tibo has confirmed that Codex really sees 5x more weekly usage. Anthropic strikes again https://t.co/qM7Q9EsyJ0
在 X 查看被引用的帖子

来源:@kimmonismus · x.com