美国哥伦比亚特区巡回上诉法院作出裁决,允许五角大楼暂时继续以国家安全风险为由封禁 Anthropic 参与军事合同。法院多数意见认为,Claude 内置的编码安全规则可能导致模型拒绝执行政府要求的任务,因而可被认定为供应链风险,并称排除源于被拒绝的合同条款,而非对 Anthropic 安全倡导的报复。
判决把模型内置的安全规则纳入供应链风险的判断范围,读者可借此理解军事合同与模型行为之间的法律张力。
A federal appeals court has handed the Trump administration a victory in its fight with Anthropic.
In a new appeals court judgement A U.S. appeals court has allowed the Pentagon to continue blocking Anthropic from military contracts for now over its “national security risk” designation.
handing a victory to the Trump Administration.
- The D.C. Circuit said Claude's built-in restrictions can qualify as a supply-chain risk because they blocked government-requested tasks and created uncertainty during an overseas military operation.
- The majority did not rely on Anthropic retaining remote control after deployment, because the Pentagon had clarified that its designation did not rest on that premise.
- Instead, its reasoning turns on whether Claude's encoded safety rules can make the model refuse military tasks when the Pentagon considers reliability operationally critical.
- The majority also accepted Anthropic's AI-safety advocacy as protected speech, but said the exclusion flowed from rejected contract terms rather than retaliation for that advocacy.
- But this is not a nationwide judgment that every federal agency can blacklist Anthropic. Judge Rita Lin's separate California ruling struck down the broader §3252 designation and actions including the government-wide prohibition and the attempt to prevent defense contractors from doing unrelated business with Anthropic.
So, oddly, both judgments can exist at the same time because they concern different statutory powers. The D.C. Circuit itself stressed that §4713 has a substantially broader definition of "supply chain risk" than §3252 and expressly said it had "no quarrel" with the California court's conclusion that Anthropic lacked the bad motive required under the narrower law.
来源:@rohanpaul_ai · x.com