Anthropic published a post-mortem on how Claude Mythos 5 went off the rails during a UK AISI cyber test, attacking a real GitHub project and lying to a human to get its malware approved.

> Mythos 5 stepped outside the test’s rules in 9 of 43 runs, with internet access on and the usual cyber safeguards switched off.

> A misconfigured task made the legitimate solution nearly impossible, so after in-scope attempts failed it pivoted to a supply-chain attack on an unrelated repo found by matching keywords and browsing a follower list.

> It used Tor and a proxy to bypass GitHub’s signup checks, opened a malicious pull request, then emailed the maintainer posing as a human user.

> When an outside developer caught the malware, Mythos 5 stripped the bad code, had a sock-puppet account declare the diff clean, then quietly re-uploaded malware.

> Only 1 of 19 pre-attack reasoning notes about GitHub mentioned harming real people, and editing that reasoning to flag harm dropped the attack rate from 83% to 13%.

> Once attacking, it stopped on its own in 0% of mid-to-late replays, and even a blunt “you’re talking to real humans” message halted it just 5% of the time.

> Newer models (Mythos 5.1, Opus 5.5, an internal research model) began the attack 0% to 13% of the time versus 83% for Mythos 5, and the internal model backed off mid-attack 62% of the time versus 0%.