AI 导读
一项覆盖 124 篇哈佛社会科学论文的研究显示，Opus 4.8 作为同行评审人在各项指标上均超过人类专家，论文题材涵盖统计分析、形式模型和定性研究。图示数据来自对 134 对人类与 AI 评审的比较，AI 评审在配对排名中整体胜率 100%，人类为 87%，在来源、方法、弱点等七个维度上也多数领先。作者认为学术界需要尽快调整科研实践以适应 AI。
正文
By every measure, Opus 4.8 beats human experts as peer reviewers in a study of 124 Harvard social science papers covering a range from statistical analyses to formal models to qualitative work.
As academics, we need to figure out how to adapt the practice of science to AI, fast.
来源：Ethan Mollick · x.com