AI 导读
重磅:OpenAI 的 10,000 个 AI 智能体,由一款能力显著强于 GPT-6 Astra 的模型驱动,解决了一个约 90 年未解的数学问题。 看起来,在这个新世界里,缩放定律可能在于智能体数量,而非模型规模:足够多的高能力智能体可以搜索远超任何人类群体的科学想法。 当数万个强大的智能体能够探索、批判并组合想法时,今天许多“太难”的问题可能主要变成一个算力问题。 就这一个问题而言,90 年来,数学家一直无法回答光滑三维流体流动是否会突然崩溃。OpenAI 提出的证明称它可以。 为了找到这个解,OpenAI 将数千个智能体分成小组探索不同想法,然后在它们之间共享最佳发现。 这次搜索耗时 88 小时,使用了约 130B 输出 token,跨越 2.7M 条消息。 随后 GPT-6 Astra 又花了 17 小时检查证明并将其转换为 Lean——一个用于验证数学证明的系统。 该 Lean 版本已公开,因此数学家可以自行审查这一论证。
正文
https://t.co/0qmS4Eo3Vg
MASSIVE: OpenAI's 10,000 AI agents, powered by a model significantly more capable than GPT-6 Astra, solved a math problem unresolved for roughly 90 years. Looks like, in this new world, the scaling law may be agent count, not model size: enough capable agents can search far more scientific ideas than any human group ever could. when tens of thousands of strong agents can explore, criticize, and combine ideas, many problems that are "too hard" today may become mostly a compute problem. For this one, for 90 years, mathematicians could not answer whether smooth 3D fluid flow can suddenly break down. OpenAI's proposed proof says it can. To find this solution, OpenAI split thousands of agents into groups exploring different ideas, then shared the best findings between them. The search took 88 hours and used about 130B output tokens across 2.7M messages. GPT-6 Astra then spent another 17 hours checking and converting the proof into Lean, a system that verifies mathematical proofs. That Lean version is public, so mathematicians can inspect the argument themselves.在 X 查看被引用的帖子
来源:@rohanpaul_ai · x.com