跳到正文
@rohanpaul_ai· @rohanpaul_ai · X·· 12 天前精选AI 评分73
AI 导读

Anthropic 在 Science Blog 中介绍,Claude 在收到描述九圈问题的单个提示词后,在 Claude Science 中基本无监督运行数天,将 planar N=4 super-Yang-Mills 模型中的散射振幅计算从 8 圈推进到 9 圈,总成本约几千美元,所用方法来自 Dixon 及其同事。

推荐理由

围绕9圈散射振幅计算,材料给出了成本、方法来源与物理学家独立验证的细节,可观察AI在理论物理研究中的介入方式。

正文

Claude pushed a frontier particle-physics calculation from 8 loops to 9.

- importantly “Claude Science accomplished this in one shot, without any scientific oversight more sophisticated than ‘keep going.’ "

- "while I'm validating Claude's result, Claude is validating all of our previous work. In fact, I would assert that Claude understands our 2019 and 2023 papers better than any human, aside from my co-authors."

Lance Dixon, Professor of Particle Physics and Astrophysics at SLAC and Stanford, who independently checked Claude’s new 9-loop result.

引用@AnthropicAI@AnthropicAI
New on the Science Blog: Yes, Claude can do Nine Loops. Theoretical physicists predict how particles behave using formulas called scattering amplitudes. These are notoriously hard to compute, so researchers work with layers of increasingly fine corrections called “loops”—each added loop makes the answer more precise but takes exponentially more computation. Most calculations stop at two or three loops. Eight loops was the previous record in a simplified model physicists use as a testing ground (planar N=4 super-Yang-Mills), set by SLAC's Lance Dixon and collaborators. Last month, physicist and science writer @4gravitons issued a challenge: could an AI push past eight loops in this model, using only the compute budget an academic could reasonably access? Given a single prompt describing the nine-loop problem, Claude ran largely unsupervised for days in Claude Science and solved it using methods developed by Dixon and his colleagues, at a total cost of a few thousand dollars. Dixon independently verified the result, and von Hippel wrote about the experience for our blog. Read more: https://t.co/CS2f2qoIhJ
在 X 查看被引用的帖子

来源:@rohanpaul_ai · x.com