To note, this isn't intelligence. This is skill. Superhuman skill. Of course it will *feel* like intelligence to anyone who equates intelligence with skill, which is probably almost everyone.

Intelligence in my definition is (and has always been) the efficiency with which you extract and operationalize the patterns you need to achieve a given level of skill. It's basically the ratio between your resources and what you can do with them, an information conversion ratio. It is not tied to any capability threshold. You can always achieve arbitrarily high skill with arbitrarily low intelligence, given arbitrarily high resources.

Humans will be left behind capability-wise in all verifiable domains, but remain many orders of magnitude more intelligent than current AI -- you didn't need 1,000,000x the code volume of all of GitHub in order to learn to code.