跳到正文
原文
Chubby♨️· @kimmonismus · X·· 5 小时前AI 评分30
AI 导读

一位用户对比 OpenAI 的 "Dot" 与 Grokbot 后表示更偏好 Grokbot,因其提供 Chief of Staff、每日团队会议让各 Grok bot 交换信息,以及按任务划分的多种会话,便于总览和同步。

正文

quick comparison between OpenAI’s "Dot" and Grokbot: I prefer Grokbot.

With Grokbot, I have a Chief of Staff, a daily team meeting where all my Grok bots exchange information, and various sessions dedicated to different tasks. This not only provides a better overview but also helps synchronize the various activities.

OpenAI’s Dot might well be very potent - especially given the capabilities offered by Astra - but I haven't quite grasped exactly who it is initially aimed at. Is it for the casual user or for more professional users? The design feels more playful- geared more toward ChatGPT users than Codex users. At the same time, however, OpenAI is heavily promoting the power of its "always-on" agents.

Once OpenAI’s Dot is further developed and allows for delegating tasks to multiple agents, I’ll give it another try.

来源:Chubby♨️ · x.com