AI 导读
Greg Brockman 转发引述 @scottnarmstrong 对 OpenAI 流体力学论文的分析,称其技术上难以置信,但仍在人类理解范围内。引文指出该文用物理不稳定性让流场自行生成振荡,以 Reynolds 应力构造坍缩光滑涡,不同于已有的凸积分构造,多个 PDE 专家小组正在消化理解。
推荐理由
转发了 PDE 专家对 OpenAI 流体论文构造手法的技术分析,帮助读者理解其新颖性与难度。
正文
“On a technical level, the paper is unbelievable, maybe beyond what a human could have come up with but not beyond human understanding”
Since I'm now blocked by bluey from replying to this thread, I answer here by quote tweet the openAI construction has more to do with convex integration than anything else. In convex integration, the oscillations are typically built by hand and the iteration procedure creates wild weak solutions. The non-uniqueness construction of Albritton–Brué–Colombo used an unstable vortex to split solutions apart. The Córdoba–Martínez-Zoroa singularities amplify vorticity across scales by strain. In the openAI paper, a fluid instability is clever made so that the flow itself generates the oscillations: they grow by drawing energy from the background shear. The Reynolds stress then becomes the force that creates the collapsing smooth vortex. Using a physical instability to create the stress in this way has no precedent, and it is what produces a smooth force rather than a merely rough one. Some on these ideas are in the literature (e.g. Leibovich-Stewartson 1983) but the way they are combined is definitely insane and definitely nowhere in the literature previously. I also don't know of anyone suggesting that convex integration would play a role in the creation of a blow-up solution like this. On a technical level, the paper is unbelievable, maybe beyond what a human could have come up with but not beyond human understanding: there are several different groups of pde experts working on understanding it who say that they more or less understand now. I expect digestions soon td;lr: anyone saying that this OAI result is unsurprising is bullshitting sorry!在 X 查看被引用的帖子
来源:Greg Brockman · x.com