跳到正文
Nathan Lambert· @natolambert · X·· 1 天前AI 评分54
AI 导读

Nathan Lambert 转评一篇关于中国 LLM 数据经济的文章,称 Mercor、Surge、Handshake 在美国掌握最大供给网络,而中国主要支出方是腾讯、阿里巴巴和字节跳动。他提出中国更倾向像美团、RedNote、小米这样自建 LLM,美国科技巨头更多基于 API 和开源权重模型,且中国在数据支出意愿上落后美国 6-12 个月,正在快速追赶。

正文

This is the best piece I’ve read to date on the Chinese data economy for LLMs, and how it compares to the US counterparts (summarized by Mercor, Surge, and Handshake having the biggest network, SUPPLY, but also many companies with specialized services, in the form of RL-ready environments). China’s leading spenders, Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance, don’t mirror OpenAI and Anthropic leading the US market.

The Chinese market likely has a bias similar to their “ownership” mentality of more LLM builders in house, like Meituan, RedNote, and Xiaomi, whereas major US tech services build more on APIs and existing open-weight models.

Altogether, it seems like Chinese labs were 6–12 months behind on willingness to spend on data, relative to the US, but are rapidly catching up.

I've been hearing lots of murmurings on China's AI industry, but folks are secretive, so it's hard to put this all together.

来源:Nathan Lambert · x.com