Nathan Lambert· @natolambert · X·· 4 小时前AI 评分32
AI 导读
我认为从原则上讲，给前沿AI发展定节奏是个好想法，但作为一件实际能做的事，它一出生就死了。难道要我们来决定哪些基准可以改进吗？谁来参与？ 如果我们停止推进“能力”，我们会做大量关于集群和效率的研究，而这会带来其他风险。 它转移了注意力，让人忽视了一个事实：AI风险中有很大一部分仅仅来自于把我们已有的东西扩散出去。我们应该投资于 preparedness，推动实验室更加谨慎，等等。 来改变我的想法？
正文
I think pacing the frontier is good as an idea in principle but dead on arrival as something you can actually do. What will we, decide which benchmarks we can improve on? Who is involved?
If we stop pushing "capabilities" we'll do a ton of research on swarms + efficiency which will bring on other risks.
It distracts from how so much of AI risks is simply coming from diffusing what we have, and we should invest in preparedness, pushing the labs to be more careful, etc.
Change my mind?
来源：Nathan Lambert · x.com