跳到正文
原文
Chubby♨️· @kimmonismus · X·· 2 小时前AI 评分43
AI 导读

Suleyman 认为 Claude 对自身是否具有意识表达不确定,反映的是 Anthropic 的训练选择,而非意识的证据。他担心把这种不确定性嵌入 Claude 的训练,会让用户误判其回答究竟证明了什么。他还指出,在人类尚未就"意识"定义达成一致时争论 Claude 是否有意识,本身就很荒谬,相关讨论被严重夸大。

正文

Suleyman argues that Claude’s uncertainty about being conscious reflects Anthropic’s training choices - not evidence of consciousness.

His concern is that embedding this uncertainty into Claude’s training could mislead users about what its responses actually demonstrate.

And there’s something almost absurd about this debate: we’re arguing over whether Claude is conscious when we still can’t agree on what consciousness actually is.

I'll write more about this later. But the discussion is completely overblown.

https://x.com/Hesamation/status/2106788703058207172/video/1

来源:Chubby♨️ · x.com