AI 导读
Anthropic 的 Max 订阅套餐因用量宣传面临拟议集体诉讼,诉讼材料称 200 美元的 Max 20x 每周用量仅为 100 美元 Max 5x 的约 2 倍。争议来自定价页的 5x 与 20x 倍数,按 Anthropic 的说明只适用于每 5 小时会话相对 Pro 的用量,而不适用于官方未披露具体额度的每周上限。诉讼称 Max 5x 的每周用量约为 Pro 的 3.5 倍,Max 20x 为 6-8 倍;法庭文件还以表格列出各档每周小时数,并指出 Max 20x 与 Max 5x 的实际差距不足两倍。
正文
more in depth: https://t.co/0oZTpqjd8y
I went down the rabbit hole: Anthropic is already being sued over exactly this. And the $200 plan really only provides only around 2x the weekly usage of the $100 plan Here is where the confusion comes from. Anthropic’s pricing page says: “Choose 5x or 20x more usage than Pro.” That naturally makes the $200 Max 20x plan sound like it includes four times the usage of the $100 Max 5x plan. Only further down does Anthropic clarify: “Max gives you 5x or 20x more usage per 5-hour session than Pro.” Those multipliers do not apply to the separate weekly caps, whose exact size Anthropic does not disclose. A proposed class action filed in June alleges that Max 5x delivers around 3.5x Pro’s weekly usage, while Max 20x delivers just 6–8x. In practice, the $200 plan therefore provides only around 2x the weekly usage of the $100 plan, sometimes even less depending on the model. The “20x” is real within each five-hour window. The weekly limit makes the overall offer look very different. h/t @Hesamation for finding the original court files first i think在 X 查看被引用的帖子
来源:@kimmonismus · x.com