跳到正文
Arena.ai· @arena · X·· 4 小时前AI 评分58
AI 导读

Arena 基于 Agent Arena 会话数据称,Google DeepMind 的模型在成本上的扩展性更好,Gemini 4 Carbon 是典型例子。

正文

Models by @GoogleDeepMind scale better on cost than their rivals.

Gemini 4 Carbon is the prime example. As tasks get more demanding, every rival gets more expensive relative to Carbon.

For a typical task, GPT-6 Astra by @OpenAI costs 3.4× as much, Claude Opus 5.5 by @AnthropicAI costs 3.9× as much, and GPT-6.1 Sol is the cheaper option at about half of Carbon’s cost (0.54×).

Across the 5% most expensive sessions, Carbon’s position improves against all three. Opus edges up to 4.2×, Astra’s cost roughly doubles relative to Carbon, and Sol’s discount shrinks.

This in turn can translate into meaningful savings across real-world tasks such as building an Android security app, one of many long-horizon tasks that our Agent Arena users delegate to their agents.

引用Arena.ai@arena
As tasks get more complex, @GoogleDeepMind and @XiaomiMiMo are the biggest winners in the Agent Arena. On cheaper tasks, @OpenAI and @AnthropicAI hold 10 of the 11 frontier spots. On the most expensive 5% of sessions, they hold just 7. The freed spots go to Google’s Gemini 4 Argon and Xiaomi’s MiMo-V2.6 Flash and Pro. These shifts matter as sessions costing $100 or more are not uncommon across real-world use cases coming from Agent Arena. Even within the last 2 weeks, more than 1,000 sessions crossed that boundary, and choosing a suboptimal model might have had a meaningful impact on that final bill.
在 X 查看被引用的帖子

来源:Arena.ai · x.com