跳到正文
DAIR.AI· @dair_ai · X·· 23 小时前AI 评分59
AI 导读

一项 Harvard-MIT 研究发现,在拍卖和匹配市场环境中,给 Agent 提示词加“提前规划”或“考虑对手”类指令反而整体降低表现。由于环境有已知最优策略,作者能对每个选择打分。

正文

Does telling your agent to plan ahead actually help?

It's standard practice to add a "plan ahead" or "think about the other players" instruction to an agent's prompt.

In auctions and matching markets, this Harvard-MIT paper finds that those prompts make play worse overall.

The authors use settings with known optimal strategies, so they can score every choice.

What helped was changing the interface.

An ascending auction, which presents one safe choice at a time, reduced bid errors across four model families. Plain descriptions of the payoffs and of why truthful bidding is safe also helped.

The agents' stated plans did not track their choices.

Interventions that improved bids left the measured reasoning quality in the plans unchanged, and some prompts improved the plans without improving bids.

The takeaway here is to evaluate a scaffold on the decisions it produces.

Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.36365

Chat with Paper: https://academy.dair.ai/papers/engineering-simplicity-simple-mechanism-interfaces-steer-llm-agents-2609.36365

来源:DAIR.AI · x.com