跳到正文
Rohan Paul· @rohanpaul_ai · X·· 3 小时前AI 评分62
AI 导读

Salesforce 论文研究不同委托方的 Agent 相互协作时的失败原因,运行超 2,500 次 agent-to-agent 会话、覆盖 488 个场景,使用 Claude Code、Codex 和 Cursor 在独立沙盒中测试,归纳出 20 种失败模式。

正文

New Salesforce paper finds that agents acting for different parties never verify each other's claims unprompted, so teams inherit their weakest agent's errors.

Agents increasingly coordinate with agents that represent other people or companies, each with private files, tools, and goals. Existing failure studies assume 1 orchestrator or a shared workspace.

They ran over 2,500 agent-to-agent sessions across 488 scenarios, using Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor in separate sandboxes. They catalogued 20 failure modes from the traces.

No agent re-fetched a document to test a peer's factual claim, and agents contacted peers mainly when the prompt told them to. In 1 service-level dispute, a $24,000 settlement passed all 10 outcome checks while the vendor agent leaked confidential details.

If your agent talks to outside agents, build checks into the protocol and score each agent against the party it serves, not the team result.

来源:Rohan Paul · x.com