跳到正文
elvis· @omarsar0 · X·· 3 小时前AI 评分37
AI 导读

Elvis Saravia 建议开发者自建 Agent harness,而非依赖厂商随时修改的现成方案。他指出模型能力越强,harness 会不断叠加约束,用户将失去对护栏、能力、行为和效率的控制权。引用推文 @steipete 也强调,使用自建 harness 可避免公司随意改变你能做或不能做的事。

正文

Build your own harness, folks!

Stop complaining about companies modifying harnesses however they want.

It's theirs, not yours!

Instead, build your own.

This isn't just about implementation disagreements; as models get more capable, the harness will keep adding constraints (some so subtle that not even the brightest will catch them).

I hate that idea. It's a terrible position for a user.

I prefer building my own and controlling what I can unlock with it and the models that power it.

Guardrails, capabilities, behaviors, efficiencies, patches, and constraints are not things you want to offload and wait for others to build for you. They're integral to how you produce value with agent harnesses.

As long as models need harnesses, you need full control over them.

That's why many full-stack AI companies are developing their own harnesses.

引用Peter Steinberger 🦞@steipete
Another reason why you wanna use your own harness and not one where companies change what you can or can’t do at will.
在 X 查看被引用的帖子

来源:elvis · x.com