跳到正文

X:Elvis Saravia

@omarsar0 · X

当前显示全部 AI 相关新闻
切换来源
全部X新闻X:Rohan Paul1981 条X:Kim1501 条X:阿易 AI Notes1175 条X:Testing Catalog583 条X:阿里云 / Alibaba Cloud571 条X:cb_doge532 条X:Alexandr Wang(Scale AI 创始人/Meta 首席 AI 官)486 条X:Elvis Saravia483 条X:OpenRouter439 条X:Elon Musk416 条X:Artificial Analysis414 条X:Ethan Mollick393 条X:PixVerse365 条X:SemiAnalysis329 条X:OpenAI Developers291 条X:ZHO269 条X:Replit266 条X:小北215 条X:Dex Horthy(HumanLayer)188 条X:AI Safety Memes182 条X:Tibo172 条X:Gemini171 条X:swyx171 条X:Emad Mostaque161 条X:MiniMax159 条X:OpenAI148 条X:X.PIN143 条X:Epoch AI136 条X:Runway132 条X:Claude Devs123 条X:Nathan Lambert122 条X:Thomas Wolf(Hugging Face 联创/CSO)121 条X:Aravind Srinivas(Perplexity CEO)120 条X:洪明119 条X:赵纯想119 条X:马东锡 NLP110 条X:Frank Wang 玉伯109 条X:Gabriel109 条X:蚂蚁百灵108 条X:Jason Liu105 条X:Google AI for Developers104 条X:Perplexity104 条X:fofr101 条X:面壁智能 OpenBMB100 条X:Yuchen Jin99 条X:Claude98 条X:阑夕95 条X:Peter Steinberger95 条X:Luma AI94 条X:Sam Altman92 条X:Tencent WorkBuddy85 条X:Thariq77 条X:Eric Zakariasson75 条X:Francois Chollet74 条X:Krea AI74 条X:opencode74 条X:Cohere73 条X:Clément Delangue(Hugging Face CEO)68 条X:Greg Brockman63 条X:karminski61 条X:Suno61 条X:Deedy Das60 条X:OpenClaw60 条X:腾讯混元58 条X:通义千问 / Qwen57 条X:Microsoft Research55 条X:Anthropic52 条X:AK51 条X:Google DeepMind46 条X:Charlie Holtz43 条X:商汤 SenseTime (@SenseTime_AI)42 条X:Google AI39 条X:Boris Cherny38 条X:Peter McCrory(Anthropic 首席经济学家)37 条X:可灵 Kling AI36 条X:Viggle AI33 条X:百度 Baidu31 条X:AI at Meta31 条X:Josh Woodward28 条X:Logan Kilpatrick28 条X:Aidan Gomez(Cohere CEO)27 条X:Mustafa Suleyman(Microsoft AI CEO)26 条X:SpaceXAI24 条X:Noam Brown23 条X:Andrew Milich22 条X:Odyssey22 条X:李继刚20 条X:Tianyi Cui20 条X:华为云19 条X:硅基流动 SiliconFlow18 条X:Mark Zuckerberg18 条X:DeepSeek16 条X:fal (@fal)14 条X:Karina Nguyen14 条X:Sundar Pichai14 条X:Mistral AI13 条X:Noah Zweben13 条X:PixVerse (@PixVerse)13 条X:智谱 Z.ai12 条X:ARC Prize (@arcprize)12 条X:Arena (@arena)12 条X:Demis Hassabis12 条X:Philipp Schmid(Google DeepMind 开发者体验) (@_philschmid)12 条X:DAIR.AI (@dair_ai)11 条X:ElevenLabs (@elevenlabs)11 条X:Eric Mitchell11 条X:Jensen Huang11 条X:Lee Robinson11 条X:唐杰10 条X:Ammaar Reshi10 条X:Andrew Ng(DeepLearning.AI 创始人)10 条X:Arthur Mensch(Mistral CEO) (@arthurmensch)10 条X:Barret 李靖10 条X:Hao AI Lab10 条X:Kimi.ai10 条X:卡兹克 (@Khazix0918)9 条X:Cursor (@cursor_ai)9 条X:Fei-Fei Li9 条X:Georgi Gerganov(llama.cpp) (@ggerganov)9 条Tripo(官方 X)8 条X:Cognition (@cognition)8 条X:Figure AI (@Figure_robot)8 条X:Gemini Notebook (@Gemini_Notebook)8 条X:Higgsfield AI (@higgsfield)8 条X:Jeff Dean8 条X:Manus (@ManusAI)8 条X:Meshy (@MeshyAI)8 条X:MiniMax Design (H3) (@Hailuo_AI)8 条X:谢赛宁7 条X:Jim Fan7 条X:Michael Truell7 条X:張小珺 Xiaojùn6 条X:Lisa Su(AMD CEO) (@LisaSu)6 条X:NotebookLM0 条@berryxia · 历史来源430 条@vista8 · 历史来源262 条@op7418 · 历史来源231 条@google · 历史来源30 条@getsuperintel · 历史来源9 条@latentspacepod · 历史来源9 条@android · 历史来源8 条@dreamlabla · 历史来源8 条@mannybernabe · 历史来源8 条@karpathy · 历史来源7 条@alexatallah · 历史来源6 条@ryanleeminimax · 历史来源5 条@theo · 历史来源5 条@aidotengineer · 历史来源4 条@dkundel · 历史来源4 条@reach_vb · 历史来源4 条@dotey · 历史来源3 条@eliebakouch · 历史来源3 条@googlechrome · 历史来源3 条@kilocode · 历史来源3 条@maxforai · 历史来源3 条@newsfromgoogle · 历史来源3 条@richardssutton · 历史来源3 条@skylermiao7 · 历史来源3 条@victorsuortiz · 历史来源3 条@ajambrosino · 历史来源2 条@akashi203 · 历史来源2 条@anatolikopadze · 历史来源2 条@andrewcurran_ · 历史来源2 条@antirez · 历史来源2 条@barrnanas · 历史来源2 条@coreyching · 历史来源2 条@deanwball · 历史来源2 条@designarena · 历史来源2 条@fellmentke · 历史来源2 条@gergelyorosz · 历史来源2 条@gmi_cloud · 历史来源2 条@gravicle · 历史来源2 条@hxiao · 历史来源2 条@id_aa_carmack · 历史来源2 条@jackminong · 历史来源2 条@lennysan · 历史来源2 条@mada299 · 历史来源2 条@microsoft · 历史来源2 条@mikastars39 · 历史来源2 条@mitchellh · 历史来源2 条@nabeelqu · 历史来源2 条@rudrank · 历史来源2 条@sebastienbubeck · 历史来源2 条@zan2434 · 历史来源2 条@___harald___ · 历史来源1 条@_boraturan · 历史来源1 条@0xjaniak · 历史来源1 条@0xkato · 历史来源1 条@47fucb4r8c69323 · 历史来源1 条@559hkdt · 历史来源1 条@aaliya_va · 历史来源1 条@abhikatte42 · 历史来源1 条@abhishekpatiil · 历史来源1 条@aboutberlin · 历史来源1 条@addyosmani · 历史来源1 条@agi2asi · 历史来源1 条@aiaicreate · 历史来源1 条@aimlapi · 历史来源1 条@aisaonehq · 历史来源1 条@aisystemprompt · 历史来源1 条@alemtuzlak · 历史来源1 条@alexxubyte · 历史来源1 条@alupsasca · 历史来源1 条@amasad · 历史来源1 条@ampcode · 历史来源1 条@anas_build_ · 历史来源1 条@aniketmaurya · 历史来源1 条@anitakirkovska · 历史来源1 条@anneliesgamble · 历史来源1 条@antigravity · 历史来源1 条@arafatkatze · 历史来源1 条@argofowl · 历史来源1 条@ashiknewazaj · 历史来源1 条@atabarrok · 历史来源1 条@atomic_chat_hq · 历史来源1 条@awe_automation · 历史来源1 条@awesomekling · 历史来源1 条@awscloud · 历史来源1 条@ayushagarwal · 历史来源1 条@baaadas · 历史来源1 条@bai_agi · 历史来源1 条@bbuddha_xyz · 历史来源1 条@bclavie · 历史来源1 条@beccalytics · 历史来源1 条@benfleming__ · 历史来源1 条@benhylak · 历史来源1 条@benjamineyliu · 历史来源1 条@bfl_ml · 历史来源1 条@bleysg · 历史来源1 条@bolna_dev · 历史来源1 条@bosmeny · 历史来源1 条@boxmining · 历史来源1 条@bozhou_ai · 历史来源1 条@brexhq · 历史来源1 条@brian_armstrong · 历史来源1 条@brianchew · 历史来源1 条@bridgemindai · 历史来源1 条@budgetpixel · 历史来源1 条@cahidarda · 历史来源1 条@calmpromptshq · 历史来源1 条@ce_zhang · 历史来源1 条@cedric_chee · 历史来源1 条@chaitralikakde · 历史来源1 条@chatgpt · 历史来源1 条@chatgptapp · 历史来源1 条@christinetyip · 历史来源1 条@christofsalis · 历史来源1 条@clark__labs · 历史来源1 条@cloudflaredev · 历史来源1 条@cnorth_13 · 历史来源1 条@cnzoecomeback · 历史来源1 条@cocohearts · 历史来源1 条@code_star · 历史来源1 条@codebyaurelia · 历史来源1 条@cohavygal · 历史来源1 条@commandcodeai · 历史来源1 条@consensusnlp · 历史来源1 条@contralabs_ai · 历史来源1 条@cozyblaze265065 · 历史来源1 条@crimedecoder · 历史来源1 条@crtr0 · 历史来源1 条@damnventures · 历史来源1 条@daniellockyer · 历史来源1 条@darioamodei · 历史来源1 条@davidmaliglowka · 历史来源1 条@davidondrej1 · 历史来源1 条@davidsacks · 历史来源1 条@dbirker78883 · 历史来源1 条@deryatr_ · 历史来源1 条@devfun · 历史来源1 条@diegocabezas01 · 历史来源1 条@digitalocean · 历史来源1 条@dimillian · 历史来源1 条@dimitrispapail · 历史来源1 条@discussingfilm · 历史来源1 条@dkthomp · 历史来源1 条@dmitryrybin1 · 历史来源1 条@dmsobol · 历史来源1 条@douglance · 历史来源1 条@douglasyaody · 历史来源1 条@duckduckgo · 历史来源1 条@easyrouterio · 历史来源1 条@edgardobriban · 历史来源1 条@eisokant · 历史来源1 条@elliotarledge · 历史来源1 条@encrypted · 历史来源1 条@endpointarena · 历史来源1 条@envato · 历史来源1 条@escanorreloaded · 历史来源1 条@esrtweet · 历史来源1 条@ethanhe_42 · 历史来源1 条@eu_commission · 历史来源1 条@fba · 历史来源1 条@fdavidsont · 历史来源1 条@figmaweave · 历史来源1 条@finn_meeks · 历史来源1 条@first_tree_ai · 历史来源1 条@flavioad · 历史来源1 条@flowith · 历史来源1 条@fminzhou · 历史来源1 条@freddie_spirit · 历史来源1 条@frydwia · 历史来源1 条@futurestacked · 历史来源1 条@garrettlord · 历史来源1 条@garrytan · 历史来源1 条@gavinsbaker · 历史来源1 条@GayaniFigma · 历史来源1 条@genspark_ai · 历史来源1 条@gitlawb · 历史来源1 条@gneubig · 历史来源1 条@gokulr · 历史来源1 条@goodfireai · 历史来源1 条@goodnesmbakara · 历史来源1 条@googleaistudio · 历史来源1 条@gordic_aleksa · 历史来源1 条@gro_tsen · 历史来源1 条@hangsiin · 历史来源1 条@happycapyai · 历史来源1 条@haydenbleasel · 历史来源1 条@helloiamleonie · 历史来源1 条@hey_asiif · 历史来源1 条@hilbertspaess · 历史来源1 条@howtoprompt__ · 历史来源1 条@hq4ai · 历史来源1 条@hypersoren · 历史来源1 条@ianbremmer · 历史来源1 条@interaction · 历史来源1 条@intology · 历史来源1 条@iron_redux · 历史来源1 条@ithilgore · 历史来源1 条@itsreallyvivek · 历史来源1 条@jamesjyu · 历史来源1 条@jameszmsun · 历史来源1 条@jason_young1231 · 历史来源1 条@jawad_rahman_ · 历史来源1 条@jaydendavisnc · 历史来源1 条@jeffbarg · 历史来源1 条@jenzhuscott · 历史来源1 条@jiayuan_jy · 历史来源1 条@jilles · 历史来源1 条@jimcramer · 历史来源1 条@jimsyoung_ · 历史来源1 条@jinjingliang · 历史来源1 条@jjacky · 历史来源1 条@jjackyliang · 历史来源1 条@joefioti · 历史来源1 条@joi___ai · 历史来源1 条@joinhandshake · 历史来源1 条@joinpursuit · 历史来源1 条@joulee · 历史来源1 条@jsconfasia · 历史来源1 条@jsrailton · 历史来源1 条@juminoz · 历史来源1 条@kaizero_ainta · 历史来源1 条@karanganesan · 历史来源1 条@kdaigle · 历史来源1 条@kentherogers · 历史来源1 条@kevinsays · 历史来源1 条@khudonogov · 历史来源1 条@kinfisht · 历史来源1 条@koraykv · 历史来源1 条@kotekjedi_ml · 历史来源1 条@kuberwastaken · 历史来源1 条@kurz_gesagt · 历史来源1 条@kwindla · 历史来源1 条@lafalcemateo · 历史来源1 条@lakshyaaagrawal · 历史来源1 条@larrylv · 历史来源1 条@layoffai · 历史来源1 条@levinstanley · 历史来源1 条@lifeofjer · 历史来源1 条@livekit · 历史来源1 条@lon · 历史来源1 条@lostinlatencyx · 历史来源1 条@lotte_verheyden · 历史来源1 条@lqiao · 历史来源1 条@luciushq · 历史来源1 条@luckeyfaraday · 历史来源1 条@lukaspet · 历史来源1 条@madhavsinghal_ · 历史来源1 条@manassharmahere · 历史来源1 条@markiewagner · 历史来源1 条@marksaroufim · 历史来源1 条@marsxiang_ · 历史来源1 条@maseehg_ · 历史来源1 条@mattshumer_ · 历史来源1 条@mem0ai · 历史来源1 条@mengto · 历史来源1 条@merettm · 历史来源1 条@micahcarroll · 历史来源1 条@michael_chomsky · 历史来源1 条@michaelarnaldi · 历史来源1 条@microsoftai · 历史来源1 条@mike_acton · 历史来源1 条@mikeyyyzhao · 历史来源1 条@minchoi · 历史来源1 条@minimaxagent · 历史来源1 条@minu_who · 历史来源1 条@mkbhd · 历史来源1 条@modal · 历史来源1 条@moritzthuening · 历史来源1 条@moxie · 历史来源1 条@mstockton · 历史来源1 条@mtslive · 历史来源1 条@multimodalart · 历史来源1 条@neelnanda5 · 历史来源1 条@neilrahilly · 历史来源1 条@nickbaumann_ · 历史来源1 条@nirantk · 历史来源1 条@noemititarenco · 历史来源1 条@notjazii · 历史来源1 条@nousresearch · 历史来源1 条@oblomovius · 历史来源1 条@ollama · 历史来源1 条@onlyterp · 历史来源1 条@onlyzhynx · 历史来源1 条@organicgpt · 历史来源1 条@orgrem · 历史来源1 条@p0 · 历史来源1 条@palantirtech · 历史来源1 条@palmerluckey · 历史来源1 条@pandatalk8 · 历史来源1 条@parishilton · 历史来源1 条@patrickcarlyle · 历史来源1 条@patricktoulme · 历史来源1 条@paulg · 历史来源1 条@paulsolt · 历史来源1 条@pbdtokenrouter · 历史来源1 条@pererabinoy · 历史来源1 条@philhchen · 历史来源1 条@pirroh · 历史来源1 条@pjaccetturo · 历史来源1 条@postlive · 历史来源1 条@pranaveight · 历史来源1 条@prathamdby · 历史来源1 条@prince_canuma · 历史来源1 条@pumpkherm · 历史来源1 条@pvncher · 历史来源1 条@qiaoqiao2001 · 历史来源1 条@rajveerbach · 历史来源1 条@randyhaddad6 · 历史来源1 条@rauchg · 历史来源1 条@raveeshbhalla · 历史来源1 条@rayanpal_ · 历史来源1 条@rayfernando1337 · 历史来源1 条@redpoint · 历史来源1 条@ric_rtp · 历史来源1 条@richardsocher · 历史来源1 条@riderashgame · 历史来源1 条@rileybrown · 历史来源1 条@robertvaradan · 历史来源1 条@ronshepherd · 历史来源1 条@rosmine · 历史来源1 条@rthiago · 历史来源1 条@ruben_kostard · 历史来源1 条@runware · 历史来源1 条@rvivek · 历史来源1 条@ryanjunejo · 历史来源1 条@safaricheung · 历史来源1 条@samuelstroschei · 历史来源1 条@sanmking · 历史来源1 条@saranormous · 历史来源1 条@savinovnikolay · 历史来源1 条@scale_ai · 历史来源1 条@scaling01 · 历史来源1 条@sdaily_ai · 历史来源1 条@secscottbessent · 历史来源1 条@seltaa_ · 历史来源1 条@sergiopaniego · 历史来源1 条@servasyy_ai · 历史来源1 条@sethltx · 历史来源1 条@shashankgoyal95 · 历史来源1 条@sherryyanjiang · 历史来源1 条@sherylhsu02 · 历史来源1 条@shl · 历史来源1 条@sighjith · 历史来源1 条@simistern · 历史来源1 条@southpkcommons · 历史来源1 条@sriramkri · 历史来源1 条@sshoaibali · 历史来源1 条@stalkermustang · 历史来源1 条@status_effects · 历史来源1 条@stevencheng · 历史来源1 条@stockanalystpro · 历史来源1 条@suekhim · 历史来源1 条@sultanalfardan · 历史来源1 条@suraj_sharma14 · 历史来源1 条@swisscheese4299 · 历史来源1 条@swmansion · 历史来源1 条@systematicls · 历史来源1 条@teksedge · 历史来源1 条@tftc21 · 历史来源1 条@theahmadosman · 历史来源1 条@themidasproj · 历史来源1 条@theonejvo · 历史来源1 条@therealadamg · 历史来源1 条@timsoulo · 历史来源1 条@tmuxvim · 历史来源1 条@tobi · 历史来源1 条@togethercompute · 历史来源1 条@trackernetwork · 历史来源1 条@trustkerneltech · 历史来源1 条@ttunguz · 历史来源1 条@tuhinchakr · 历史来源1 条@twistartups · 历史来源1 条@ubermenscchh · 历史来源1 条@udayan_w · 历史来源1 条@usefastlane · 历史来源1 条@uzyn · 历史来源1 条@valeriocapraro · 历史来源1 条@vasuman · 历史来源1 条@vdbergrianne · 历史来源1 条@vibeguessing · 历史来源1 条@victoriakimse · 历史来源1 条@victoriawu77 · 历史来源1 条@victortaelin · 历史来源1 条@vikaskansalhq · 历史来源1 条@volchika · 历史来源1 条@walden_yan · 历史来源1 条@warpdotdev · 历史来源1 条@waynesutton · 历史来源1 条@wesroth · 历史来源1 条@whosamberella · 历史来源1 条@xdinodeer · 历史来源1 条@xicilion · 历史来源1 条@xucian_ · 历史来源1 条@yacinemtb · 历史来源1 条@yaojingang · 历史来源1 条@yevr19 · 历史来源1 条@yoheinakajima · 历史来源1 条@yongquanyq · 历史来源1 条@youtubejocoding · 历史来源1 条@yusufg · 历史来源1 条@zachbussey · 历史来源1 条@zeddotdev · 历史来源1 条@zeroxkyle · 历史来源1 条@zhenthebuilder · 历史来源1 条@zicohacks · 历史来源1 条@zixuanli_ · 历史来源1 条@zymazza · 历史来源1 条
483 条AI 相关新闻 · 最新在前
今天10月7日周三
  1. elvis57

    Parsewave 发布 AutomationBench Verified,对 Zapier AutomationBench 全部 600 个公开任务的验证器进行独立审计,人工确认 206 个真实 bug 并全部修复。

    引用shaped@shaped

    AutomationBench Verified is out. We went through all 600 public tasks in @Zapier's AutomationBench and checked every verifier. • Agents flagged 323 verifiers as suspicious, human review confirmed 206 real bugs, all 206 are fixed. • We replayed 1,235 Kimi K3 runs on the old and fixed verifiers and 344 of them (27.9%) got a different grade • Where verifiers were too strict, pass rate went from 18.8% to 43.8% • Where they were too lenient, it dropped from 60.2% to 49.7% Audit and dataset links below.

  2. elvis55

    Gumloop 上线 Agent Browsers,为没有 MCP 或 API 的任务提供云端浏览器代理,支持安全凭据存储与 1Password 集成、会话回放和隐身代理会话,且完全与模型无关。作者推荐称,该产品可在无连接器时打开独立云沙箱浏览器完成登录和导出下载,任务执行一次后步骤会保存为 recipe,之后每周自动重复。

    引用Gumloop@gumloop

    Agent Browsers are live on Gumloop today so your agents can reach the work that doesn't have an MCP or API > Secure credential storage & 1Password integration > Session replays to see your agents work > Stealth, proxied sessions All completely model agnostic Try Browser today.

  3. elvis61

    Parsave 发布 AutomationBench Verified,对 Zapier AutomationBench 全部 600 个公开任务的验证器做独立审计,人工确认 206 个真实 bug 并全部修复。

    引用shaped@shaped

    AutomationBench Verified is out. We went through all 600 public tasks in @Zapier's AutomationBench and checked every verifier. • Agents flagged 323 verifiers as suspicious, human review confirmed 206 real bugs, all 206 are fixed. • We replayed 1,235 Kimi K3 runs on the old and fixed verifiers and 344 of them (27.9%) got a different grade • Where verifiers were too strict, pass rate went from 18.8% to 43.8% • Where they were too lenient, it dropped from 60.2% to 49.7% Audit and dataset links below.

  4. elvis55

    AgentMail 推出 AgentID,定位为 AI 智能体的"Sign in with Google",让智能体用自己的身份登录应用。每个智能体获得一个关联真实人类所有者的验证收件箱,应用可据此识别背后的人。作者 Elvis Saravia 表示自己常用个人智能体此前只能借用本人登录或在注册时被拦截,认为智能体拥有独立身份早该实现。

    引用Haakam Aujla@haakamaujla

    Introducing AgentID by @agentmail, "Sign in with Google" for AI Agents Millions of agents already use AgentMail. AgentID lets them sign in to your app. Integrate with the prompt below, reply with a screenshot, and we'll give you 3 months free of any AgentMail plan.

  5. elvis45

    拥有你自己的智能技术栈,各位! 先从挖掘你智能体追踪记录中的丰富知识开始。 然后训练小型专用模型来解决生产问题。 @OvermindLab 是开源的,让这一切变得可行。它从你的智能体追踪记录中构建数据集,用你当前的模型进行评估,并训练出一个你拥有的更小的专用模型。

    引用Overmind@OvermindLab

    Overmind turns anyone into an AI lab. • Builds a context graph from code and traces • Curates training and eval datasets • Evaluates prompts and models • Trains smaller, specialized models https://github.com/overmind-core/overmind

  6. elvis36

    Ampersand 是专为企业 AI 智能体打造的集成基础设施,让智能体能在 Salesforce、SAP、NetSuite、Workday 等系统中执行操作,已支持 11x、Orb 和 Square。用户只需在一份配置中定义每个客户的对象与映射,Ampersand 负责处理认证、重试、回填和监控。企业系统高度定制化,API 和 MCP 并不友好,一次错误写入就可能毁掉试点或续约。

    引用Ayan Barua@ayanb

    Your AI is vaporware without deep integrations with your customers’ systems of record. Introducing @WithAmpersand: integration infrastructure for enterprise agents. We power 11x, Orb, and Square's ability to take agentic action in systems of record like Salesforce, SAP, NetSuite, and Workday. Ask anyone serious about building AI and they’ll tell you: - The SaaSpocalypse didn’t happen. The world depends on CRMs, ERPs, HRISs, and ITSMs. - Your customers customized their deployments beyond recognition. - Systems of record companies are basically monopolies. They never had to make their APIs and MCPs user-friendly. - Docs don't explain half the weird edge cases you'll hit. - One bad write can blow up your pilot or renewal. - Once you finally get it working, someone changes a field and it breaks again. The world's data lives in structured databases. AI needs a translation layer to work with it. So, for your AI to truly transform the way enterprises work, you'll need deep integrations built for: - scoped permissions - bi-directional actions - real-time speed for agents - custom objects, fields, and workflows for each of your customers We built Ampersand to power the future of software. AI didn't trivialize writing integrations. It made them the critical path. I believe that deeply, so I didn't make a launch video about Ampersand. Instead, it's the best builders I know explaining just how big of a challenge this is.

10月6日周二
  1. elvis63

    Mistral 发布 Mistral Large 4,1T 参数、49B 激活、原生多模态,称其为欧美最佳开源权重模型,API 已可用,开源权重预计 10 月底发布。作者 Elvis Saravia 表示对其性能不算太惊艳,认为在 Kimi、Qwen、DeepSeek、GLM 等近期进展之后很多人会有同感,但看好开源权重前沿模型的多样化和可定制价值,并认为多模态是 Mistral Large 可以突出的方向,网络安全方向也值得关注。

    引用Mistral AI@MistralAI

    Meet Mistral Large 4, aka Le Chonk. • 1T parameters, natively multimodal. 49B active. It is the best open weights model from US or Europe on aggregated benchmarks. • State-of-the-art on critical workloads, including cyber defense, manufacturing and finance and it surpasses closed frontier models on visual grounding. • Forged in Europe end-to-end and is deployable from Europe via our own Mistral Cloud infrastructure. • Available to all via API today. Working with cybersecurity partners privately. Open weights release end of October.

  2. elvis57

    Gamma 发布 Gamma 5,称是公司史上最大的产品改版,重建了 agent、设计工具、编辑、导入导出和 connectors 等功能。改版源于团队认为 AI 工具普及后各家输出千篇一律,新版本支持按品牌美学或全新风格生成演示、文档、社交素材和图形,底层接入多个前沿与图像模型。引用作者 Elvis Saravia 表示试用后幻灯片更有个人风格、贴合其品牌调性。

    引用Grant Lee@thisisgrantlee

    Everyone is sick of generic AI, including us. Gamma was the first AI presentation platform to reach real scale. But now that AI tools are everywhere, everything looks the same. Earlier this summer, we came to an uncomfortable conclusion: without a step change in visual variety, Gamma’s output would look and feel too similar to all the other AI tools. The entire point of a presentation is to help someone "get" your idea, to see it as unique and do something with it. We started over. Today we're shipping Gamma 5, the biggest product overhaul in our company's history. We rebuilt Gamma to create presentations that actually look like you and your brand. Your teams can design anything they dream up, following your brand's aesthetic or something entirely new, with every frontier and image model under the hood. And the same goes for your docs, social assets, and graphics. We revamped our agent, design tools, editing, import, export, connectors, and more. Get your ideas out there.

  3. elvis42

    和 Jev 一样,我相信 RL 会解锁更多类似这样的成果,大幅削减关键智能体操作的成本。 flow-1 在性能上很有竞争力,但在发现智能体追踪中的故障方面能大幅节省成本。 RSI 不只适用于通用智能。它同样会加速专用智能。

    引用Robert@skull8888888888

    Introducing flow-1, our new model trained with RL to find errors in agent traces. It matches GPT-6-sol in trace intelligence while being 23x cheaper. It also costs 25% less to run than GPT-6-luna. flow-1 finally makes it possible to monitor and understand every agent run, without sampling. 1/6

  4. elvis56

    Eon 推出 Era,可生成一个完整的模拟企业环境,覆盖 Salesforce、Slack、Jira、Zendesk、Gong、Deel 等系统及云数据库和存储,Agent 通过 MCP 和 API 接口与之交互。每个系统模拟真实厂商行为,包括 rate limits、分页和错误码;因环境由 Era 生成,平台掌握精确的 ground truth,可重置后对同一任务重复运行,以测量改动模型或提示词后的影响。产品今日上线且免费,与 NVIDIA、Decart、Composio 等有研究合作。作者 Elvis Saravia 评价称模拟企业对改进智能体产品很重要,因为好的 Agent 评测需要行为接近真实公司的环境。

    引用Ofir Ehrlich@OfirEhrlich

    You can’t safely test an enterprise agent on a real company’s data. So we built a company for it to work in. Era is live today, and it’s free. It generates a complete simulated enterprise that behaves like a real one across Salesforce, Slack, Jira, Zendesk, Gong, Deel and more, along with cloud databases and storage. Agents interact with it through live MCP and API interfaces. People leave. Deals change. Records get duplicated. Permissions differ across systems. And because Era generated the company, it knows the exact ground truth. Test, benchmark and improve agents against realistic enterprise workloads, use the failures for targeted post-training, then rerun the same environment to measure the impact. Huge thanks to our research partners @NVIDIA, @Decart, @Composio, @openlayerco, @Deel, @Eragon and @Plurai, with more coming soon.

  5. elvis45

    推荐。LLM 智能体喜欢结构,所以语料库能改善智能体搜索并不意外。

    引用DAIR.AI@dair_ai

    Banger paper from Microsoft and colleagues. If you run agents that search a large document collection, this one is worth your time. (bookmark it) They introduce CorpusMap, which resolves recurring entities across the collection in advance and gives each entity a page that links to every document that mentions it. The original documents stay in place. The agent reads a document, follows an entity to related documents, and avoids searching for the same evidence again. Across 7 models and three benchmarks, answer quality goes up 6.4 to 11.7 points while input tokens drop 34% to 57%. It also beats an LLM Wiki layer and three other navigation layers. The map can be built without LLM calls and updated as new documents arrive. Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.37226 Chat with Paper: https://academy.dair.ai/papers/follow-the-entities-a-corpus-map-for-agentic-search-2609.37226

10月5日周一
  1. elvis64

    Nolla Health 成为美国首个获得监管批准、可用 AI 开具初始处方的机构,作者 Elvis Saravia 转发了这一消息。AI 目前可在犹他州用于痤疮治疗,覆盖接诊、皮肤扫描、评估、处方和随访,必要时由临床医生介入;引用内容称其可能是全球首个端到端 AI 医生。

    引用Luis Wenus@luiswenus

    Today, Nolla Health became the first organization in the U.S. (and possibly the world) to receive regulatory approval for an AI to issue initial prescriptions. This makes Nolla the first ever actual end-to-end AI doctor.

  2. elvis45

    Elvis Saravia 主张个人智能体应当完全自建自持,从 traces 到记忆再到所有输出都归自己所有,而不是等待厂商修复 bug 或解决安全顾虑。他认为 AI 让构建和维护智能体变得简单,可从零开始保持极简并随需求演进,也可基于开源方案 Pi Durable 起步。

    引用Kun Chen@kunchenguid

    there’s something quite awkward about all the personal agents in the current hype cycle muse, grok bot, instinct, dots, and whatever google, anthropic will come up with none of them is “mine” i’d be trusting a vendor for some of the most sensitive data about me and bet on them handling it with extreme responsibility. what if they have a data leakage incident? what if they hired a wrong employee? what if they simply break bad? i’d also be betting on their model. right now i’ve set up a lot of my stuff in grok bot, but what if their model falls behind? what if another model becomes 10x better on pure intelligence? then i’ll either miss out on a better assistant, or have to bite the bullet and do a full migration i’d also have to bet on their product. they may not build the features i want. they may not allow me to customize enough. and one day my assistant may show me ads that feels like way too much betting than what i’d be comfortable with, if i truly want literally everything in my life to go through and be taken care of by an assistant with all that considered, i’m more bullish on open source personal agents that run on people’s own computers. but i think these open source projects have to break out of the assumption that their users are developers and they can just throw a repo at them and ask them to launch a terminal a well polished, fool proof, community maintained, vendor agnostic, free personal agent that everyone can run by themselves without locking into a SaaS - that’s what i think many people will need

  3. elvis45

    如今,我花在验证智能体写的代码上的时间,比写代码还多。 这是所谓软件工厂的一大瓶颈。 来自 @ContextQa 的 Ship 会接收 Slack 或 Linear 中报告的 bug,复现它,并把上下文交给 Claude Code 或 Codex 去修复。 编程智能体需要这种反馈循环,才能更擅长修复自己的 bug。

    引用Deep Barot@deepcabinwala

    Everyone got a coding agent. Nobody got a QA engineer. Until today. Meet Ship, your Autonomous Quality Engineer. It tests deployed PRs, reproduces bugs from Slack and Linear, and hands Claude or Codex the context to fix them. Try it free: https://ship.contextqa.com

  4. elvis59

    Elvis Saravia 在引用 Karpathy 关于用 ASD-STE100 写作、图表、网页和讲解视频等方式理解 LLM 输出的帖子时,分享了自己数月来实验的通用人机协作界面。

    引用Andrej Karpathy@karpathy

    We'll be spending a lot more time trying to understand the outputs of language models. A few thoughts, tips & tricks: Writing. Something I've had success with: Ask your LLM to explain something in ASD-STE100, it's a controlled language specification originally developed for aerospace maintenance documentation. LLMs well-versed in this language and it comes with heavy constraints on clean writing style that I often find a lot more readable. Sometimes I've tried to soften it a bit e.g. ask for "80% of the way to ASD-STE100" because the spec is quite stringent. But even better: Diagrams / images. Instead of writing, ask your LLM to create a diagram. These can be a lot easier to process, parse, and understand. But even better: Web pages. Ask for output "in HTML" to get a beautiful, interactive webpage. LLMs are getting really good at frontend and can create beautiful experiences, animations, etc. But even better: Explainer videos. The output format I am most bullish on is fully custom / bespoke explainer videos generated on any arbitrary topic. Experiment with things like "Create a 3b1b style video explainer on X. Use my ElevenLabs API key for audio narration". (you'd need an API key for the latter or you can ask your LLM to find you decent free alternatives that use your local compute). This is actually starting to work! In summary: - As LLMs get better, they will do more and more of the legwork autonomously, and a lot more of our work will rise up the abstractions into oversight and understanding. - Luckily, LLMs can help here too because as intelligence and code are increasingly abundant, you can ask for large, custom, discardable software artifacts (e.g. web apps, video explainers) that would have never made sense to create before. Push the boundaries here and you'll be surprised.

10月4日周日
  1. elvis32

    长期使用终端的开发者表示,AI 智能体已让他完全放弃终端操作,如今可以委托给智能体的工作大幅增加,且已有明显更好的智能体交互界面。他认为终端时代积累的系统思维仍是 AI 时代的护城河,有助于设计实用的沙箱及其上层抽象。

    引用Yuchen Jin@Yuchenj_UW

    I was a terminal person for 15+ years. I loved Vim, knew all the shortcuts, and a black terminal made me feel like I was a cool hacker in The Matrix. But terminals assume humans operate computers directly via files, commands, processes. Agents changed all that. You just say your intent. The agent operates the machine, using the same programming languages and Linux commands we spent years learning. I’m still glad I learned computer systems before the AI era though. Understanding what sits beneath the abstraction makes you a better systems thinker. That’s a moat in the AI era.

  2. elvis32

    Elvis Saravia 认为通过 CLI 使用编码智能体的方式已经过时,交互正直接发生在智能体之间。他的做法是混合使用高层持久化智能体(如 dots)和专用智能体(如 codex desktop 会话),由持久化智能体管理专用智能体,并借助自建的智能体编排器获得灵活性。

    引用Yuchen Jin@Yuchenj_UW

    I haven’t touched Claude Code or Codex CLI in a while. The terminal era is over imo. It's the wrong interface for coding agents. Tabs are ephemeral, but context is persistent, and managing 30 tabs is pure cognitive overhead. I don’t really need an IDE like Cursor either. I rarely navigate the whole codebase anymore. The new primitive is the agent, not the file. (Codex desktop app is the best agentic UI for now. But we’re still early.)

  3. elvis59

    Meta Superintelligence Labs 论文发现,预训练 LLM 配上轻量推理框架后可在足够测试时预算下超越 RL 后训练版本。后训练把任务推向必解或必不解,提升一致性但降低覆盖,作者称之为 Sharpening Tax;在 14 类基座/后训练配对、42 组设置中普遍存在,其 PTGS 方法按提示词难度自适应调整 RL 采样温度,付出更小代价并提升 pass@1。论文见 https://academy.dair.ai/papers/sharpening-tax-in-post-training-2610.01509。

    引用DAIR.AI@dair_ai

    Banger paper from Meta Superintelligence Labs. They find something super interesting and unexpected. (bookmark it) Base models with a light harness often solve more agentic tasks than their RL post-trained versions when both get enough samples. Post-trained models win on pass@1. At large K, base models frequently solve tasks the post-trained ones never solve on BFCL v4 multi-turn, ACEBench, and WebShop. This is because post-training pushes each task toward always solved or never solved. Consistency goes up, and coverage goes down. The authors call the lost test-time scalability the Sharpening Tax. Across 42 base and post-trained pairs, it shows up in most settings, grows with model size, and can be estimated from a few rollouts. Their fix, PTGS, sets the sampling temperature per prompt from its estimated difficulty during RL. It pays a smaller tax and also raises pass@1. Paper: https://academy.dair.ai/papers/sharpening-tax-in-post-training-2610.01509

10月3日周六
  1. elvis38

    Kled V3 可将实验室指定的数据采集任务在 72 小时内分发至其 50 万+ 自愿贡献者网络,覆盖图像、视频、音频、文本与标注共 108 个可配置模板。贡献者用手机按说明和合格示例采集真实世界数据,形成"定位模型失败→生成采集任务→获取新样本→再训练评估"的更紧反馈闭环。

    引用Kled AI@useKled

    This is Kled V3. We've solved data collection for artificial general intelligence. Any consumer dataset that can exist, can now be collected from physical reality in under 72 hours. All powered by the largest and most comprehensive data application layer on the planet. (Thread)

10月2日周五
  1. elvis48

    AgentWorld 将 3 到 20 个不同角色的 LLM 智能体放入游戏沙盒,执行 50+ 轮的长程任务,智能体无法看到彼此内部状态,只能通过消息和共享计划协调。Gemini 3 Flash 任务成功率最高,为 52.0%;协调类任务最难,成功率仅 12%,常见失败包括沟通中断、角色混淆和共享计划丢失。论文显示,多智能体团队中不到三分之一的行动真正有助于完成任务。

  2. elvis50

    我认为更快的推理是编程智能体下一个重大突破之一。 Volantis 正在利用光学技术为每颗芯片提供远超以往的内存和更高的内存带宽。他们的目标是在超过 10T 参数的模型上,实现每用户每秒高达 10,000 tokens。这太疯狂了! 以那种速度,今天需要数小时的编程智能体可以在几分钟内完成。 绝对是我最近见过的最令人兴奋的融资之一。

    引用Tapa Ghosh@semiDL

    Excited to announce Volantis's $88M Series A. We are solving Al's memory bottleneck by using optics, enabling chips with huge amounts of fast & cheap memory. By boosting both the memory bandwidth and capacity per chip by orders of magnitude, we enable ultra-fast inference (up to 10,000 tps/user) for large models (>10T) - with low $/tok to boot. Initially, this will enable insanely fast agents - think coding agents that finish in minutes or even seconds instead of hours. More excitingly, optics is a fundamentally scalable way to increase memory systems. Not 2X/year, but by orders of magnitude across new generations. This will enable a structurally new Al industry, including restarting scaling laws, holding entire repos in context windows & more. Our team has pioneered many core semiconductor technologies: the 1st CoWoS product, early HBM, the 1st silicon photonics CPO systems, the 1st high volume tunable VCSELs, the 1st processors to directly communicate using light & more. We’ve already sent data >10× farther than equally tiny electrical wires inside a chip package. Our next iteration is already taped out and targets world-record bandwidth density over relevant distances, read more: https://volantissemi.ai/news-insights/our-88m-series-a-demolishing-the-memory-wall-with-photonics-post

  3. elvis48

    我觉得 AI 语音缺了一个质检层。 在我构建的大多数应用里,语音听起来已经很棒了。但真正让我在生产环境翻车的,是模型把“Q3”、“v1.2”或某个品牌名读错。 这对人们对语音智能体的感知影响巨大。 @OnepinAI 正在解决这个问题。在你听到之前,他们会检查每一行的自然度、清晰度和发音。 当某个词读错时,它会直接修复那个词,而不是重新生成整行。

    引用Soohyun Bae@RealSoohyunBae

    Your AI voice sounds human. So why can't it say your product's name? A great AI voice reads "Porsche Taycan" as TAY-can. Porsche says TIE-kahn. It guessed from the spelling, and nobody caught it, because nobody listens to line 1,200. Today we're launching Onepin: the production step after text-to-speech. It checks every line of voiceover before it ships using the voices you already work with. Onepin can: ➤ Check people's and product names against a 4-million-word pronunciation dictionary ➤ Spell out prices and dates before the voice speaks ➤ Score every line of audio for naturalness, clarity and word accuracy ➤ Fix the one wrong word in the same voice, without re-rendering the take Works with your voice subscription on @ElevenLabs, @OpenAI, @Google and 30+ more. No phonetic spellings to type. No re-rolls. No switching providers. Free to start, no credit card required. Hear the before and after in the thread ⬇️

  4. elvis48

    webAI 开源 3.6B 参数模型 TwIL-LM3-Pro,可在普通电脑本地运行,BIG-Bench Hard 得分 95.4,远超 Qwen3-8B 的 63.7。其训练配方为:形式逻辑微调后将权重合并回基座模型,再用程序化验证器做 RL,逻辑分数提升且通用推理保持稳定。

    引用David Stout@Davidstout

    Half a million downloads in a month. Today, our open source family takes another step forward. Thank you for the incredible support behind our first-generation models. We’re excited to introduce TwIL-LM3-Pro. At just 3.6 billion parameters, it brings powerful reasoning to everyday computers, with quantized builds that run locally. No cloud required. In our evaluation: Formal logic: Highest recorded headline score among the small models compared—beating China’s VibeThinker-3B by 35% and Qwen3.5-4B by 24%, and Liquid AI’s LFM2.5-8B-A1B by 47%. Broader reasoning: 95% on SVAMP and 64.1% on MuSR, the highest recorded scores among the small models compared. BIG-Bench Hard’s logic subset: 95.4%, compared with VibeThinker-3B’s 61.1%. We believe AI is entering a post-training era. The advantage will increasingly belong to companies with the best pipelines and those that can produce capable, personalized intelligence faster and more efficiently, then put it on devices people already own. That’s what we’re building at webAI. And we’re only beginning to share what’s coming out of our lab. Coming soon: Meridian, our family of frontier-class models built to run on device. Our most advanced models will be available through the @thewebAI application. Join the waitlist as we expand access. Proudly built in Austin, Texas. 🇺🇸