跳到正文
Alexandr Wang· @alexandr_wang · X·· 3 小时前AI 评分36
AI 导读

muse wonder full 在 VulcanBench 上 整体上与 Astra、Opus 5.5 和 Sol 6.1 相当有竞争力,但确实更慢,这是我们正在改进的地方 ⚡️

正文

muse wonder full on VulcanBench

pretty competitive overall with Astra, Opus 5.5, and Sol 6.1, but definitely slower which is something we’re working on ⚡️

引用Morgan@morganlinton
Okay my Muse Wonder Full benchmark is now complete with @VulcanBench - busy weekend so might not get to put all the data and model cards together until next week. But I wanted to share a quick peek at the combined score and how it compares to other models. The TL;DR is, with Muse Wonder Full, Medium effort seems to be the sweet spot, but, you need to take tokens-per-task and cost-per-task into account when deciding what model to use. In the two tables below, first is combined accuracy score, second is time per task. Right now Muse Wonder Full is quite a bit slower than Opus 5.5, much slower than GPT-6.1 Sol, and way slower than GPT-6 Astra. Overall, based on what I'm seeing, I would use Opus 5.5 or GPT-6.1 Sol over Muse Full at this point. You'll get the same or better accuracy faster and cheaper. More to come in model cards and deeper analysis on the site, but it's the weekend and I'm hanging with family more than doing benchmarks so might be a day or two. You should do the same! 🖖
在 X 查看被引用的帖子

来源:Alexandr Wang · x.com