跳到正文
@omarsar0· @omarsar0 · X·· 2026-09-04AI 评分36
AI 导读

Elvis Saravia 试用 AI 员工 Viktor 在 Slack 中筛选 agent 论文,第 19 天它未经询问主动发帖指出新论文与模块 4 的路由部分矛盾,两天后又自动起草修正稿但未发布,该模块有 2100 名学员。所有操作都以待批准提案形式返回,因此他持续使用。

正文

I read AI papers for a living, but it has become impossible to track insights.

Every week I triage agent papers for our Top AI Papers of the Week digest.

A few weeks ago, I tried @viktor_com, an AI employee that works inside Slack, in the channel where that triage happens.

I asked it to go through the week's agent papers and pull three worth reading.

It sent the list back that same morning.

On day 19, it posted in the channel without being asked. "Six more landed overnight. One of them contradicts the routing section in module 4."

Two days later, again without me, it drafted the correction and left it unpublished. 2,100 people are on that module.

Everything it did came back as a proposal for me to approve. That is why I kept it running.

Finding new papers is easy. Knowing when one of them breaks something is much harder - in my case, the course lessons I teach.

If you run agents for weeks at a time, look closely at how the approval trail works. Happy to go deeper on this one.

来源:@omarsar0 · x.com