@kimmonismus· @kimmonismus · X·· 2026-05-21精选AI 评分69
AI 导读
Cursor 发布 Composer 2.5,在 Artificial Analysis 编码智能体指数上得分 62,比上一代 Composer 2 提升 14 分,位列第三,仅次于 Claude Opus 4.7(max)的 66 分和 GPT-5.5(xhigh)的 65 分。标准版每任务成本 0.07 美元、Fast 版 0.44 美元,而上述两款更高分模型分别约为 4.10 和 4.82 美元。该模型仅在 Cursor IDE 和 Cursor CLI 提供,无外部 API,基于 Kimi K2.5 继续训练;推文作者认为性能略好却贵 60 倍已不再划算。
推荐理由
推文用每任务成本对比 Composer 2.5 与两个更高分编码智能体,读者可据此权衡编码任务上的性能与花费。
正文
Composer 2.5 scores 62 on the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.
The two models above it score 65 and 66.
The price difference: $0.07 per task vs. $4–5.
At some point "slightly better" stops being worth "60x more expensive," and most engineering teams crossed that point a while ago.
60x.
Cursor's new Composer 2.5 takes third on the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index and is ~10-60x lower cost than the higher-effort Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.5 variants above it. This release puts Composer among the leading coding agent models, something that wasn’t clear for past releases @cursor_ai has released Composer 2.5, the latest model in its Composer line. Composer 2.5 scored 62 on our Coding Agent Index, a 14 point gain over Composer 2 (48). This puts it in third place of our tested agents, behind only Claude Opus 4.7 (max) in Claude Code (66) and GPT-5.5 (xhigh reasoning) in Codex (65). These cost $4.10 and $4.82 per task respectively, ~10x the cost of Composer 2.5 Fast ($0.44) and ~60x the cost of Composer 2.5 standard ($0.07). Key results for Composer 2.5 in Cursor CLI: ➤ Cost-quality Pareto frontier: At $0.07 (standard) and $0.44 (Fast) per task, Composer 2.5 is cheaper than every other agent scoring above 60 on the Index. Medium-effort peers cost $1.24–$2.21 per task; higher-effort variants land 3-4 points above at $4.10–$4.82 ➤ Per-benchmark gains vs Composer 2: +35 points on SWE-Bench-Pro-Hard-AA (12% → 47%), +2 points on Terminal-Bench v2 (64% → 66%), and +3 points on SWE-Atlas-QnA (69% → 72%). At 47%, Composer 2.5's score on SWE-Bench-Pro-Hard-AA is comparable to Claude Opus 4.7 (max) in Claude Code ➤ Among the fastest coding agents: Composer 2.5 Fast runs at an average wall time of 6.7 minutes per task, the third-fastest agent on the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, behind only Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) in Claude Code (5.8m) and GPT-5.5 (medium) in Cursor CLI (6.2m) ➤ Fast mode enables better responsiveness at 6x pricing: Fast runs 30% faster than standard Composer 2.5, but is ~6x the cost per task ($0.44 vs $0.07). Token pricing is 6x higher for Fast: $3.00/$15.00 vs $0.50/$2.50 per million input/output tokens Model details: ➤ Base model: Continued training on @Kimi_Moonshot's open weights Kimi K2.5 as with Composer 2, with Cursor reporting ~85% of total compute from its own additional training and reinforcement learning ➤ Pricing: $0.50/$2.50 per million input/output tokens for the standard variant; $3.00/$15.00 for the Fast variant (the default in Cursor) ➤ Available exclusively in Cursor: both Cursor IDE and Cursor CLI, an externally accessible API is not available Congratulations @cursor_ai and @mntruell on the impressive release!在 X 查看被引用的帖子
来源:@kimmonismus · x.com