跳到正文
dex· @dexhorthy · X·· 2 小时前AI 评分40
AI 导读

Dex Horthy 认同“删除 wiki、让智能体直接从源码回答问题”的思路,认为文档或分层摘要只有在不降低质量的前提下提速才有意义,否则宁可承受一点速度损失也坚持从源码出发。他称仍无法释怀“为人类建的代码库”与“为智能体建的代码库”这一框架对比,并指出对闭源代码库而言,Mintlify 这类文档可能是用户智能体集成时所需的“一手来源”。

正文

I cannot cosign the $32m paper but yes I am nodding along to this one pretty hard

Only reason for any kind of doc/summary (eg compacted summary per dir down the hierarchy) is if it increases speed without reducing quality , but unless you’re buildings evals specific to your codebase watching like a hawk, simpler answer is live with a little speed hit and just go from source every time

I still can’t get over the overall framing of “codebases for humans” vs “codebases for agents”

And also mintlify/docs in general probably serve as one of those “primary sources” if your codebase is closed and your users’ agents need a primary source to integrate it

引用jacob@jsnnsa
No. We've got to stop applying old human-centric patterns to working in the new era. delete all your wikis. have an agent answer questions from source instead. at spawn we have: - zero dashboard tools - zero docs - we do not make or use summaries everything we do is primary sources + intelligence Nothing to go stale Nothing to organize Nothing to navigate Always exactly up to date Perfectly personalized The answers get better with every model If we want to see a chart, we ask for it, and we have it in a minute If we want an answer to a question, we ask it, and we have a to-the-minute correct answer
在 X 查看被引用的帖子

来源:dex · x.com