跳到正文

全部动态

今日 2 条
9月14日周一
  1. Mustafa Suleyman40

    这是一个非常直白且符合常识的观点:技术的目的是服务人类,加速人类繁荣。 任何无法实现这一目标的技术都是失败的,应当被拒绝。 我们还没有到那一步。但开始为这种可能性做准备是正确的。

    引用Satya Nadella@satyanadella

    Any pursuit of superintelligence has to be grounded in the core principle that if the AI we build is not helping humanity and under human control, it's not worth pursuing. We also need to accelerate and spread the benefits of AI, such that they are diffused broadly across countries, communities, and companies. This requires a frontier ecosystem in which both closed and open-source models can thrive. And for firms, it’s imperative that they retain full control over their unique and tacit knowledge. Every organization should be able to build its own continuous learning loop/hill climbing machine, without becoming dependent on any one model provider, and have the ability to embed its own knowledge into models and weights they control. So, in this context, we welcome the research, focus, and deliberate pacing needed to get alignment right as the design goal. We also welcome ideas like "embedded evaluators" and the broader efforts to develop the mechanisms to make this more than just talk. The key is that this cannot be controlled by a handful of entities, but must have broad representation across the ecosystem, countries, and fields, including academia. This is the approach we are taking: broad access and choice at every layer of the AI stack; enterprise control of learning loops and models; and the “Code of Conduct” that underlies our own first party MAI models that we’ll publish tomorrow for public consultation.

  2. elsewhere articles38

    当具身智能走到十字路口:苏度、蚂蚁灵波、自变量、破壳谈四种一线判断

    苏度科技韩铮、蚂蚁灵波沈宇军、自变量王潜、破壳许华哲在 2026 Inclusion 外滩大会圆桌中,围绕具身智能的数据来源、模型路线与落地场景展开了一场未收敛的路线级分歧讨论。对话聚焦 GPT-6 Astra 的能力边界及其对具身行业的冲击,并探讨高成功率与泛化性、客户持续付费等跨越泡沫的指标。嘉宾还就五年后被高估与低估的领域给出各自判断。

  3. Claude Platform release notes60

    Claude API Messages 支持按需压缩对话,compact-2026-09-04 beta 上线

    Claude API 的 Messages API 新增按需压缩对话功能,以 compact-2026-09-04 beta 头开启。发送顶层 compaction 参数后返回带签名的压缩块概括所发消息,后续请求可先发该块替代原消息,支持后台运行、保留最近轮次原文,且在支持保留 thinking 的模型上已保留轮次的 thinking 可保持有效。

    推荐理由:原文给出了 compaction 的调用方式和 beta 头参数,开发者可据此评估在长对话场景里如何按需压缩上下文。

  4. LangChain Blog49

    医疗与生命科学领域的智能体规模化:来自 Madrigal Pharmaceuticals、Abridge 和 Vizient 的经验

    LangChain 博客总结医疗与生命科学行业智能体规模化经验:76% 受访机构将 tracing、评估和支出可见性列为扩大智能体自主权的前提,49% 正在建设公司级智能体平台或“agent factory”,33% 聚焦已有纸质记录的受监管文档与后台流程,26% 在运行或构建面向患者和会员的对话式智能体(含语音),另有 26% 尝试让非工程师在中央护栏内构建智能体。

9月13日周日
  1. Sakana AI Blog50

    Sakana AI 提出 PC-ALM:无需反向传播训练 1000 层网络

    Sakana AI 提出 PC-ALM,一种仅靠局部动力学、无需反向传播即可训练 1000 层神经网络的局部学习替代方案。该方法将预测编码推广为使用增广拉格朗日,引入对偶神经元(拉格朗日乘子)参与层内动力学,使每层成为 PI 反馈控制系统以最小化局部预测误差。PC-ALM 能将信号传播到近乎任意深度,在标准预测编码难以学习的深层窄网络中尤其有效,并可能为神经形态硬件上的深度学习提供参考。

  2. Demis Hassabis62

    Demis Hassabis 发文表示 Dario Amodei 新文《We Must Pace the Frontier》指出了正确的前进方向,细节仍需完善,但方向对应对这一关键时刻是正确的。他还附上自己此前提出的前沿 AI 行业标准机构提案链接;Dario 原文宣布 Anthropic 将为第三方评估者提供永久员工级系统访问权限。

    引用Dario Amodei@DarioAmodei

    We Must Pace the Frontier: I’ve written a new essay on why the AI industry should slow down, with a three-part plan for doing so. Anthropic is unilaterally committing to the first of these steps. We’ll provide third-party evaluators with permanent, employee-level access to our systems, so that they can verify adherence to our safety measures, report on incidents, and assess models’ alignment during training. You can read the full post here: https://darioamodei.com/post/we-must-pace-the-frontier

  3. Peter McCrory69

    Dario Amodei 发表文章《We Must Pace the Frontier》,主张 AI 行业应放慢速度并给出三部分计划,Anthropic 单方面承诺执行其中第一步。该步骤是向第三方评估者提供永久的员工级系统访问权限,用于核验安全措施落实、报告事故并评估训练中模型的对齐情况。全文见 https://darioamodei.com/post/we-must-pace-the-frontier,作者 McCrory 认为嵌入式评估者是合理的第一步。

    引用Dario Amodei@DarioAmodei

    We Must Pace the Frontier: I’ve written a new essay on why the AI industry should slow down, with a three-part plan for doing so. Anthropic is unilaterally committing to the first of these steps. We’ll provide third-party evaluators with permanent, employee-level access to our systems, so that they can verify adherence to our safety measures, report on incidents, and assess models’ alignment during training. You can read the full post here: https://darioamodei.com/post/we-must-pace-the-frontier

    推荐理由:Anthropic 首席经济学家推荐 Dario Amodei 新文,提出给第三方评估者永久员工级访问权以核验安全措施,可了解行业自律的具体动作。

  4. Aidan Gomez47

    卡特尔这边有些“好主意”: - 你们得给我们员工级别的权限,访问你们整个运营体系 - 如果我们觉得你们不够“安全”,抱歉,为了“安全”我们得把你们关停 - 中国不会遵守,但其他所有人都得遵守!不然就没芯片! 真是绝了。

    引用Sam Altman@sama

    I agree with Dario that we need to pace the frontier. This has been a primary topic of discussions we've had at OpenAI in recent weeks. Committing to having independent evaluators with employee-like access is a great idea, and we will do the same. We'll have more to share soon.

  5. LangChain Blog66

    LangChain 发布付费广告 Agent 并开源,分享构建经验

    LangChain 开源其 Paid Media Agent 并复盘构建过程,该 Agent 驻留 Slack,用于管理跨五个付费渠道的广告活动。六个月内付费媒体从 0 做到占营销管道的 20%,CPL 从 6 月到 8 月下降 30%。

    推荐理由:原文给出了 Agent 工程的具体设计决策和成本数据,读者可以迁移其上下文分层和权限设计方法到自己的 Agent 项目。

9月12日周六
  1. ByteByteGo32

    为什么 Git revert 会产生冲突?

    git revert 不重写历史,而是新建一个提交来撤销早先提交的改动,因此当后续提交修改了同一批代码行时就会触发冲突。例如 C2 添加功能、C3 又改了这些行,撤销 C2 便会与 C3 的改动相撞,Git 无法判断哪个版本正确。解决方式是运行 git revert C2,在冲突处暂停后手动修改文件、暂存并继续,最终生成一个干净撤销 C2 且保留 C3 的新提交。

  2. ViggleAI42

    你肯定没见过这个: GPT-6 Astra 用于场景与道具建模 + PINOC mcp 用于可动画的高斯泼溅角色

    引用PINOC@Viggle_PINOC

    GPT-6 Astra can now generate animatable Gaussian Splat characters. We connected it to the PINOC MCP and asked for a backrooms-style, Exit 8-ish game. We described the character we wanted and the motions. [MCP link in the comment 👇] Astra generated the character and every motion through PINOC through free preset animations and text to animation, and wrote the loop and the anomaly logic itself, and shipped the whole thing in a few sessions.

  3. Peter McCrory46

    这是该模型的一个重要局限。我们聚焦于 AI 转型的供给侧(AI 能做什么、扩散多快、劳动者转岗多快)。 价格是灵活的,总需求等于经济体的产出能力。 更多思考见 🧵

    引用modest proposal@modestproposal1

    Anthropic's economic scenario analysis is interesting. But this is not something you can ignore, this is the most important consideration! "the model cannot generate the negative feedback in which disruption depresses demand and amplifies its own labor-market consequences"