Agent 智能体

Cursor's new Composer 2.5 takes third on the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index and is ~10-60x lower cost than the higher-effort Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.5 variants above it. This release puts Composer among the leading coding agent models, something that wasn’t clear for past releases @cursor_ai has released Composer 2.5, the latest model in its Composer line. Composer 2.5 scored 62 on our Coding Agent Index, a 14 point gain over Composer 2 (48). This puts it in third place of our tested agents, behind only Claude Opus 4.7 (max) in Claude Code (66) and GPT-5.5 (xhigh reasoning) in Codex (65). These cost $4.10 and $4.82 per task respectively, ~10x the cost of Composer 2.5 Fast ($0.44) and ~60x the cost of Composer 2.5 standard ($0.07). Key results for Composer 2.5 in Cursor CLI: ➤ Cost-quality Pareto frontier: At $0.07 (standard) and $0.44 (Fast) per task, Composer 2.5 is cheaper than every other agent scoring above 60 on the Index. Medium-effort peers cost $1.24–$2.21 per task; higher-effort variants land 3-4 points above at $4.10–$4.82 ➤ Per-benchmark gains vs Composer 2: +35 points on SWE-Bench-Pro-Hard-AA (12% → 47%), +2 points on Terminal-Bench v2 (64% → 66%), and +3 points on SWE-Atlas-QnA (69% → 72%). At 47%, Composer 2.5's score on SWE-Bench-Pro-Hard-AA is comparable to Claude Opus 4.7 (max) in Claude Code ➤ Among the fastest coding agents: Composer 2.5 Fast runs at an average wall time of 6.7 minutes per task, the third-fastest agent on the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, behind only Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) in Claude Code (5.8m) and GPT-5.5 (medium) in Cursor CLI (6.2m) ➤ Fast mode enables better responsiveness at 6x pricing: Fast runs 30% faster than standard Composer 2.5, but is ~6x the cost per task ($0.44 vs $0.07). Token pricing is 6x higher for Fast: $3.00/$15.00 vs $0.50/$2.50 per million input/output tokens Model details: ➤ Base model: Continued training on @Kimi_Moonshot's open weights Kimi K2.5 as with Composer 2, with Cursor reporting ~85% of total compute from its own additional training and reinforcement learning ➤ Pricing: $0.50/$2.50 per million input/output tokens for the standard variant; $3.00/$15.00 for the Fast variant (the default in Cursor) ➤ Available exclusively in Cursor: both Cursor IDE and Cursor CLI, an externally accessible API is not available Congratulations @cursor_ai and @mntruell on the impressive release!

📣Meet Qwen3.7-Max — our latest flagship, made for the Agent Era. A versatile foundation for agents that actually get things done: 🧑‍💻 Coding agent, end to end. Frontend prototypes, multi-file refactors, real debugging — nails it. 🗂️ A reliable office and productivity assistant. Get your work done through MCP integrations and multi-agent orchestration. ⏱️ Long-horizon autonomy. 35 hours straight on a kernel optimization task — 1,000+ tool calls, zero hand-holding. 🔌 Scaffold-agnostic. Claude Code, OpenClaw, Qwen Code, or your own stack. Consistent reliability everywhere. API's up on Alibaba Model Studio. You can also take it for a spin on Qwen Studio. Go build something wild!🏃🏃‍♂️ 📖 Blog: qwen.ai/blog?id=qwen3.7 ✅ Qwen Studio: chat.qwen.ai/?models=qwen3.7… ⚡️ API：modelstudio.console.alibabac…

兄弟们！ 今天已经可以在ZenMux上免费体验Gemini 3.5 Flash 了！ 我第一时间用它跑了那个经典的「AI模型递归二叉树生长测试」. 同一个 Prompt ，不同模型画出的树形态完全不一样。（见视频-Prompt见评论区） Gemini 3.5 Flash 从输入提示词到生成完整 HTML 动画网页（树干慢慢长出、分支递归展开、最后随风摇摆），全程只用了 77.56 秒！ 整体效果非常惊艳：树形态自然优雅、生长动画丝滑、视频和内容呈现都顶级！ 熟悉的老朋友都知道，ZenMux 每次新模型都是 ZeroDelay 首发. Google I/O 2026 今天刚发布，现在立刻就能通过 API 调用！ 还有免费额度可以白嫖～ 速度是真的没话说，还完美保留了旗舰级模型的能力。 专为 Agent 设计，在 MCP Atlas、Toolathlon、Finance Agent 等多项榜单直接拿下第一！ 多模态理解也极强：MMMU-Pro 83.6%、CharXiv Reasoning 84.2%，全面超越上一代 Gemini 3.1 Pro。 完全兼容主流 API 格式，无需改动现有工具链。 支持按量计费 + Builder 套餐。 👇 直接体验 正式版 → zenmux.ai/google/gemini-3.5-… 免费试用 → zenmux.ai/google/gemini-3.5-… Video

Google’s new Gemini 3.5 Flash is the clear leader on the Intelligence vs Speed Pareto frontier and makes large gains on GDPval-AA (real-world agentic tasks), but is 5x the cost of Gemini 3 Flash @GoogleDeepMind gave us pre-release access to Gemini 3.5 Flash, the latest model in its Flash family, which has traditionally has offered faster, lower-cost alternatives to Gemini Pro models. Gemini 3.5 Flash scores 55 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, up 9 points from Gemini 3 Flash, driven primarily by agentic performance gains and hallucination reduction. It achieves speeds of over 280 output tokens/s, but higher token usage and token pricing make it over 5x more costly to run the Intelligence Index than Gemini 3 Flash, and 75% more costly than Gemini 3.1 Pro. Gemini 3.5 Flash is $1.50/1M input and $9/1M output tokens, Gemini 3 Flash was $0.5/$3 per 1M input/output tokens, a 3x increase. The rest of the increase was driven by higher token usage when running our benchmarks Key results for Gemini 3.5 Flash with ‘high’ thinking level: ➤ 9 point Intelligence Index improvement: Gemini 3.5 Flash scores 55 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, up 9 points from Gemini 3 Flash. This places it ahead of Grok 4.3 (high, 53) and Claude Sonnet 4.6 (max, 52). The model improves across nearly all evaluations, with the largest gains coming from agentic evaluations and AA-Omniscience (knowledge and hallucination). On AA-Omniscience, Gemini 3.5 Flash improves by 11 points, driven primarily by reduced hallucinations, with its hallucination rate falling to 61%, a 31 point decrease compared to Gemini 3 Flash ➤ Agentic capability improvements: Gemini 3.5 Flash improves substantially over Gemini 3 Flash across our agentic evaluations, in both GDPval-AA (real-world agentic tasks) and Tau2-Bench Telecom (agentic tool use). Its GDPval-AA result is especially notable, achieving an Elo of 1656, well ahead of Gemini 3 Flash (1204) and Gemini 3.1 Pro (1314), and just behind GPT-5.4 (xhigh, 1674). This represents a meaningful step forward for Google in agentic performance, which has historically been a relative weakness for Gemini models ➤ Speed-intelligence frontier: Gemini 3.5 Flash achieves speeds of over 280 output tokens per second, ~70% faster than Gemini 3 Flash and models such as gpt-oss-120b and GPT-5.4 mini (xhigh). With its 55 Intelligence Index score, this places Gemini 3.5 Flash on the speed-intelligence Pareto frontier alongside Gemini 3.1 Pro and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite, reinforcing Google’s strength in models balancing speed and intelligence ➤ 5.5x increase in cost to run: Gemini 3.5 Flash costs $1,552 to run the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 5.5x more than Gemini 3 Flash and 75% more than Gemini 3.1 Pro. This is driven by increases in both token usage and token prices. Output token usage is broadly unchanged from Gemini 3 Flash (73M vs. 72M), but input token usage increases significantly, driven primarily by an increase in the number of turns in agentic evaluations. Gemini 3.5 Flash is priced 3x higher than Gemini 3 Flash at $1.50/$9.00 per 1M input/output tokens, with a 90% discount for cached input tokens ➤ Google continues to lead multimodal performance: Gemini 3.5 Flash is multimodal, supporting image, video, and speech input alongside text. This differs from many proprietary models, including Claude Opus 4.7, Grok 4.3, and GPT-5.5, which support image input only. In our multimodal evaluation, MMMU-Pro, Gemini 3.5 Flash scores 84% - the highest score recorded. This puts models from Google in the top two spots, with Gemini 3.1 Pro scoring 82% Key model details: ➤ Context window: Retains the same 1M context window as Gemini 3 Flash ➤ Multimodality: Text, image, video and speech input with text output only ➤ Pricing: $1.50/$9.00 per million input/output tokens, with a 90% discount for cached input tokens Congratulations @GoogleDeepMind , @sundarpichai and @demishassabis on the great release!

Introducing Gemini 3.5: our newest family of models combining frontier intelligence with real-world action. The first release is 3.5 Flash, our strongest model yet for agents and coding 🧵

Gemini Spark is your new 24/7 personal AI agent. Give it a task and it works autonomously in the background, even if your phone and laptop are turned off. You choose to turn it on and it's designed to check with you before taking major actions. #GoogleIO