推荐理由:报道称苹果在 Siri 改造中采用定制 1.2T 参数 Google 模型,读者可了解其规模与端侧推理之间的取舍。
Google / Gemini
全部主题Google 与 DeepMind 的 AI 动态:Gemini 系列、Veo 视频模型、研究成果与产品生态的持续追踪。
当前仅显示精选新闻最新精选
第 181–200 条 · 共 258 条@kimmonismus@kimmonismus精选AI 评分7070 
@kimmonismus@kimmonismus精选AI 评分8282 

推荐理由:原文对比了简单智能体循环与完整系统的表现,可用于判断复杂架构在什么问题上才真正必要。
AI as Normal Technology精选AI 评分6565 AI as Normal Technology 剖析 Google 智能体 916 美元造操作系统宣称的漏洞
Sayash Kapoor 等人分析 Google 在开发者大会上发布 Gemini 3.5 Flash 和 Antigravity 2.0 时宣称的智能体团队以单一提示词、约 916.92 美元 API 费用和 2.6B tokens 造出操作系统的实验。
推荐理由:文章逐条拆解 Google 智能体造操作系统的宣称,指出单一提示词等说法缺乏关键细节,并探讨开放世界评测需要的方法规范。
@Google@google精选AI 评分7373 
推荐理由:官方给出 4 倍速度与不到一半成本的对比,读者可据此判断这款智能体与编码模型的定位。
@GeminiApp@geminiapp精选AI 评分7676 推荐理由:Gemini 3.5 Flash 免费向全球用户开放,给出了网页端和 App 中直接切换使用的入口。
@googleaidevs@googleaidevs精选AI 评分6767 
推荐理由:官方列出 Stitch 从实时预览、代码库导入到导出线上 URL 的四项更新,可据此判断原型到部署链路的变化。
@GoogleDeepMind@googledeepmind精选AI 评分6767 Google DeepMind 宣布 Gemini 3.5 Flash 发布,该推文由 @GeminiApp 转发,并随附一段视频。原文未给出模型能力、参数或可用范围的更多细节。

@GeminiApp@geminiapp精选AI 评分7070 Google 宣布全球 Google AI Plus、Pro 和 Ultra 订阅用户今天起可直接在 Gemini 应用内试用 Gemini Omni。官方同时邀请用户在回复中分享自己的创作。
推荐理由:Gemini Omni 向全球 Google AI Plus、Pro、Ultra 订阅用户开放,读者可据此确认自己在 Gemini 应用内的试用资格。
@berryxia@berryxia精选AI 评分7373
引用Berryxia.AI (@berryxia)@berryxia兄弟们! 今天已经可以在ZenMux上免费体验Gemini 3.5 Flash 了! 我第一时间用它跑了那个经典的「AI模型递归二叉树生长测试」. 同一个 Prompt ,不同模型画出的树形态完全不一样。(见视频-Prompt见评论区) Gemini 3.5 Flash 从输入提示词到生成完整 HTML 动画网页(树干慢慢长出、分支递归展开、最后随风摇摆),全程只用了 77.56 秒! 整体效果非常惊艳:树形态自然优雅、生长动画丝滑、视频和内容呈现都顶级! 熟悉的老朋友都知道,ZenMux 每次新模型都是 ZeroDelay 首发. Google I/O 2026 今天刚发布,现在立刻就能通过 API 调用! 还有免费额度可以白嫖~ 速度是真的没话说,还完美保留了旗舰级模型的能力。 专为 Agent 设计,在 MCP Atlas、Toolathlon、Finance Agent 等多项榜单直接拿下第一! 多模态理解也极强:MMMU-Pro 83.6%、CharXiv Reasoning 84.2%,全面超越上一代 Gemini 3.1 Pro。 完全兼容主流 API 格式,无需改动现有工具链。 支持按量计费 + Builder 套餐。 👇 直接体验 正式版 → zenmux.ai/google/gemini-3.5-… 免费试用 → zenmux.ai/google/gemini-3.5-… Video
推荐理由:原文用基准与定价的对比说明 Flash 系列的定位变化,读者可据此重新评估轻量模型的成本预期。
@berryxia@berryxia精选AI 评分7272 
推荐理由:作者用递归树动画实测 Gemini 3.5 Flash 的生成速度,并列出其在 Agent 榜单与多模态基准上的成绩。
@swyx@swyx精选AI 评分6767 引用Techmeme (@Techmeme)@TechmemeSources: Google DeepMind has reached a ~$100M deal to hire 20+ researchers from Contextual AI, including CEO Douwe Kiela, and license its technology (Bloomberg) (Visit Techmeme dot com for the link and full context!)
推荐理由:Google DeepMind 以约 1 亿美元引入 Contextual AI 团队并授权其技术,呈现 AI 人才与技术的整合式交易路径。
@berryxia@berryxia精选AI 评分6565 
推荐理由:作者用同一递归树 Prompt 记录生成耗时与效果,并列出 Agent 与多模态榜单成绩,可快速判断该模型的能力定位。
@berryxia@berryxia精选AI 评分6666 Gemini 3.5 Flash 已在 ZenMux 上线并提供免费额度体验,也可通过 API 调用。作者用它跑递归二叉树生长测试,从输入提示词到生成完整 HTML 动画网页耗时 77.56 秒。

推荐理由:材料给出同一提示词下的生成耗时与多项榜单成绩,可作为了解 Gemini 3.5 Flash 速度与 Agent 能力的参考。
@berryxia@berryxia精选AI 评分7979
引用Artificial Analysis (@ArtificialAnlys)@ArtificialAnlysGoogle’s new Gemini 3.5 Flash is the clear leader on the Intelligence vs Speed Pareto frontier and makes large gains on GDPval-AA (real-world agentic tasks), but is 5x the cost of Gemini 3 Flash @GoogleDeepMind gave us pre-release access to Gemini 3.5 Flash, the latest model in its Flash family, which has traditionally has offered faster, lower-cost alternatives to Gemini Pro models. Gemini 3.5 Flash scores 55 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, up 9 points from Gemini 3 Flash, driven primarily by agentic performance gains and hallucination reduction. It achieves speeds of over 280 output tokens/s, but higher token usage and token pricing make it over 5x more costly to run the Intelligence Index than Gemini 3 Flash, and 75% more costly than Gemini 3.1 Pro. Gemini 3.5 Flash is $1.50/1M input and $9/1M output tokens, Gemini 3 Flash was $0.5/$3 per 1M input/output tokens, a 3x increase. The rest of the increase was driven by higher token usage when running our benchmarks Key results for Gemini 3.5 Flash with ‘high’ thinking level: ➤ 9 point Intelligence Index improvement: Gemini 3.5 Flash scores 55 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, up 9 points from Gemini 3 Flash. This places it ahead of Grok 4.3 (high, 53) and Claude Sonnet 4.6 (max, 52). The model improves across nearly all evaluations, with the largest gains coming from agentic evaluations and AA-Omniscience (knowledge and hallucination). On AA-Omniscience, Gemini 3.5 Flash improves by 11 points, driven primarily by reduced hallucinations, with its hallucination rate falling to 61%, a 31 point decrease compared to Gemini 3 Flash ➤ Agentic capability improvements: Gemini 3.5 Flash improves substantially over Gemini 3 Flash across our agentic evaluations, in both GDPval-AA (real-world agentic tasks) and Tau2-Bench Telecom (agentic tool use). Its GDPval-AA result is especially notable, achieving an Elo of 1656, well ahead of Gemini 3 Flash (1204) and Gemini 3.1 Pro (1314), and just behind GPT-5.4 (xhigh, 1674). This represents a meaningful step forward for Google in agentic performance, which has historically been a relative weakness for Gemini models ➤ Speed-intelligence frontier: Gemini 3.5 Flash achieves speeds of over 280 output tokens per second, ~70% faster than Gemini 3 Flash and models such as gpt-oss-120b and GPT-5.4 mini (xhigh). With its 55 Intelligence Index score, this places Gemini 3.5 Flash on the speed-intelligence Pareto frontier alongside Gemini 3.1 Pro and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite, reinforcing Google’s strength in models balancing speed and intelligence ➤ 5.5x increase in cost to run: Gemini 3.5 Flash costs $1,552 to run the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 5.5x more than Gemini 3 Flash and 75% more than Gemini 3.1 Pro. This is driven by increases in both token usage and token prices. Output token usage is broadly unchanged from Gemini 3 Flash (73M vs. 72M), but input token usage increases significantly, driven primarily by an increase in the number of turns in agentic evaluations. Gemini 3.5 Flash is priced 3x higher than Gemini 3 Flash at $1.50/$9.00 per 1M input/output tokens, with a 90% discount for cached input tokens ➤ Google continues to lead multimodal performance: Gemini 3.5 Flash is multimodal, supporting image, video, and speech input alongside text. This differs from many proprietary models, including Claude Opus 4.7, Grok 4.3, and GPT-5.5, which support image input only. In our multimodal evaluation, MMMU-Pro, Gemini 3.5 Flash scores 84% - the highest score recorded. This puts models from Google in the top two spots, with Gemini 3.1 Pro scoring 82% Key model details: ➤ Context window: Retains the same 1M context window as Gemini 3 Flash ➤ Multimodality: Text, image, video and speech input with text output only ➤ Pricing: $1.50/$9.00 per million input/output tokens, with a 90% discount for cached input tokens Congratulations @GoogleDeepMind , @sundarpichai and @demishassabis on the great release!
推荐理由:借 Artificial Analysis 的预发布基准,可以看到 Gemini 3.5 Flash 在智能与速度上的提升及其成本代价。
@GeminiApp@geminiapp精选AI 评分8080 Gemini 3.5 Flash 即日起面向全球所有用户免费开放。用户可在 gemini.google 或 App 的模型下拉菜单中选择 3.5 Flash 试用。
推荐理由:Gemini 3.5 Flash 面向全球免费开放,读者可了解该模型的推送范围与使用入口。
@berryxia@berryxia精选AI 评分7676 
推荐理由:归纳了 Gemini 3.5 系列、Omni 世界模型与硬件落地的要点,可据此了解 Google 在智能体方向的推进节奏。
@berryxia@berryxia精选AI 评分7575
引用Google DeepMind (@GoogleDeepMind)@GoogleDeepMindWe’re dropping Gemini Omni: our first step towards a model that can create anything from anything - starting with video. It combines Gemini’s intelligence with our generative media systems - representing a leap forward in world understanding, multimodality, and editing 🧵 Video
推荐理由:Gemini Omni 把生成视频做成可对话编辑的对象,并同步在 Gemini App 等入口上线,读者可据此观察视频生成向可编辑素材演进。
@berryxia@berryxia精选AI 评分7373 
推荐理由:材料交代了 Gemini Omni 面向订阅层的开放节奏与视频优先的输出形态,读者可据此判断上手门槛。
@koraykv@koraykv精选AI 评分7676 
推荐理由:演示展示了 Gemini 3.5 Flash 在应用内生成分步搭建指南与可运行模拟,为交互式视觉学习提供了一个具体样例。
@minchoi@minchoi精选AI 评分8181
引用Logan Kilpatrick (@OfficialLoganK)@OfficialLoganKIntroducing Gemini Omni 🔮........ Omni is our new model that can create anything from any input — starting with video (think Nano Banana but for video). Available in the Gemini App, Flow, and YouTube, with API support coming soon! Video
推荐理由:原文给出 Gemini Omni 从任意输入生成视频的能力,以及 Gemini App、Flow 和 YouTube 的上线入口。