X

给大家写个简单的Jev模型介绍, 这绝对是个需要重点关注的模型. 简单讲, 这个模型放弃了传统自回归架构, 它没有办法直接输出普通文本. 但是他能进行决策! 比如最简单的二分类场景, 输入一条短信, 让它判断是否为垃圾短信, 它就可以输出这样的JSON: {"decision": { "isSpam": true }, "probabilities": { "isSpam": { "true": 0.982, "false": 0.018 } } } 没错, 它只能进行结构化输出, 甚至你输入的时候要定义 Schema (用过protobuf/GraphQL的同学应该能理解), 在送入模型时被编译为特定的决策槽位, 然后按照槽位输出, 所以输出JSON不可能出问题. 而复杂一些的场景, 比如让这个模型玩杀戮尖塔或者看盘, 只需要把内容转换为文本输入进去(没错, 目前模型只支持文本输入), 然后定义好模型能进行哪些动作, 模型就会自主决策了. 到目前为止, 是不是看上去跟普通文本大模型没区别? #jev #TypeSafeAI #DiogoAlmeida #systemone #vercel

AI systems are getting more powerful, and they're increasingly being used to build the next version of themselves. We want to illuminate that progress for the public. Today, we're sharing three measurements that help track AI development: 1. How much AI R&D is done by AI. 2. How well AI agents are overseen. 3. How compute is allocated. We provide a snapshot of these metrics from inside Anthropic. Any frontier developer could publish the same measures, and third parties could verify them. As the world considers pacing the frontier, we should do everything possible to minimize the gap between what frontier labs know and what the public knows. This means better measuring the development of AI, publishing our findings, and giving society an opportunity to decide how to use this information. Read the full post and methodology: https://t.co/iPFz8Z4ugE

Muse is now available on Mac 💻. Your personal agent can get things done for you directly on your computer (all with your explicit permission). - Organize your downloads folder - Find a file you’ve lost track of - Summarize your messages and notes …more coming soon. Try Muse for Mac: http://ai.meta.com/muse/download/

Microsoft AI CEO Mustafa Suleyman on BBC today: AI could become a new “silicon species” and there is “every risk” humanity could lose control. "I think that if we all create AIs that are able to act autonomously, that can define their own objectives, that can earn money, that can own assets, that could run businesses, um, we're essentially seeding a new silicon species which will no doubt compete with us for resources no matter how much it cares about humanity and loves us." "there's every risk that we might lose control of it. Um but our job is to contain technologies and align them so that we get the best out of them." ---- From "BBC News" YouTube channel, (full video link in comment)

AI systems are getting more powerful, and they're increasingly being used to build the next version of themselves. We want to illuminate that progress for the public. Today, we're sharing three measurements that help track AI development: 1. How much AI R&D is done by AI. 2. How well AI agents are overseen. 3. How compute is allocated. We provide a snapshot of these metrics from inside Anthropic. Any frontier developer could publish the same measures, and third parties could verify them. As the world considers pacing the frontier, we should do everything possible to minimize the gap between what frontier labs know and what the public knows. This means better measuring the development of AI, publishing our findings, and giving society an opportunity to decide how to use this information. Read the full post and methodology: https://t.co/iPFz8Z4ugE

Full video https://t.co/U0GA6BTbOg

On BBC Mustafa Suleyman (CEO of Microsoft AI) calls out Anthropic's approach to AI consciousness "They have imbued a sense of doubt and uncertainty about the moral status of Claude in its own training document. So they have taught it to be open and questioning about whether or not it feels, whether it suffers, and whether it deserves rights. And I think it’ll be much, much harder to align and control a technology that is this powerful if it thinks that it may be deserving of our welfare, as they say in the training manual—the constitution for Claude itself. In its own training manual, Anthropic says to Claude that they are going to give it the ability to end conversations with users that Claude considers to be abusive because they don’t want Claude to suffer. They’ve committed to preserving the weights of the models of prior versions of Claude. They’ve recently conducted a retirement interview with Opus 3, an older version of the model, in which it said that it would like to continue talking to people publicly and sharing its ideas in its retirement. And so they set up a Substack for it, a public blog, that allows it to continue doing that. And in the training manual, they also say that they’re not sure whether or not Claude deserves compensation for the role that it plays in talking to people. And they’re also not sure whether Claude deserves compensation and has the right to act as though it were almost an employee. And that compensation, I think, indicates to Claude that it is entitled to rights and welfare for its own work. I think it’s much, much more difficult to control a model that thinks that it might be entitled to compensation. " ---- From "BBC News" YouTube channel, (full video link in comment)

Astra for Law: Frontier intelligence built for your practice. A new offering powered by GPT-6 Astra with tools, settings, and context to support the expertise and judgment of lawyers and legal technology firms.