跳到正文

X

关注 AI 研究者、开发者与机构的动态

当前显示全部 AI 相关新闻
按账号或来源筛选(541)
全部X新闻X:Rohan Paul2039 条X:Kim1538 条X:阿易 AI Notes1238 条X:Testing Catalog620 条X:阿里云 / Alibaba Cloud579 条X:cb_doge538 条X:Elvis Saravia495 条X:Alexandr Wang(Scale AI 创始人/Meta 首席 AI 官)494 条X:OpenRouter454 条X:Elon Musk444 条X:Artificial Analysis439 条X:Ethan Mollick401 条X:PixVerse372 条X:SemiAnalysis340 条X:OpenAI Developers294 条X:ZHO284 条X:Replit272 条X:小北218 条X:Dex Horthy(HumanLayer)196 条X:AI Safety Memes188 条X:Tibo179 条X:Gemini175 条X:swyx171 条X:Emad Mostaque167 条X:MiniMax160 条X:OpenAI151 条X:X.PIN144 条X:Epoch AI140 条X:Runway133 条X:Nathan Lambert128 条X:赵纯想126 条X:Claude Devs125 条X:Aravind Srinivas(Perplexity CEO)124 条X:Thomas Wolf(Hugging Face 联创/CSO)122 条X:洪明119 条X:蚂蚁百灵118 条X:Jason Liu118 条X:马东锡 NLP114 条X:Gabriel112 条X:Frank Wang 玉伯111 条X:Perplexity108 条X:Google AI for Developers104 条X:fofr103 条X:Yuchen Jin102 条X:面壁智能 OpenBMB101 条X:阑夕100 条X:Claude99 条X:Luma AI98 条X:Peter Steinberger98 条X:Sam Altman93 条X:Tencent WorkBuddy85 条X:Thariq84 条X:Cohere79 条X:Eric Zakariasson77 条X:Krea AI77 条X:Francois Chollet75 条X:opencode75 条X:Clément Delangue(Hugging Face CEO)71 条X:Suno69 条X:OpenClaw65 条X:Greg Brockman64 条X:Deedy Das61 条X:karminski61 条X:腾讯混元58 条X:通义千问 / Qwen57 条X:Microsoft Research56 条X:Anthropic54 条X:AK51 条X:Google DeepMind47 条X:商汤 SenseTime (@SenseTime_AI)43 条X:Charlie Holtz43 条X:Peter McCrory(Anthropic 首席经济学家)42 条X:Boris Cherny41 条X:Google AI41 条X:可灵 Kling AI37 条X:Viggle AI33 条X:百度 Baidu32 条X:AI at Meta32 条X:Aidan Gomez(Cohere CEO)28 条X:Josh Woodward28 条X:Logan Kilpatrick28 条X:Mustafa Suleyman(Microsoft AI CEO)26 条X:Noam Brown24 条X:SpaceXAI24 条X:Andrew Milich22 条X:Odyssey22 条X:李继刚21 条X:Tianyi Cui20 条X:华为云19 条X:硅基流动 SiliconFlow18 条X:Mark Zuckerberg18 条X:Arena (@arena)17 条X:DeepSeek16 条X:fal (@fal)16 条X:DAIR.AI (@dair_ai)15 条X:Karina Nguyen14 条X:Mistral AI14 条X:PixVerse (@PixVerse)14 条X:Sundar Pichai14 条X:ARC Prize (@arcprize)13 条X:Demis Hassabis13 条X:Noah Zweben13 条X:智谱 Z.ai12 条X:ElevenLabs (@elevenlabs)12 条X:Lee Robinson12 条X:Philipp Schmid(Google DeepMind 开发者体验) (@_philschmid)12 条X:卡兹克 (@Khazix0918)11 条X:Eric Mitchell11 条X:Georgi Gerganov(llama.cpp) (@ggerganov)11 条X:Jensen Huang11 条X:唐杰10 条X:Ammaar Reshi10 条X:Andrew Ng(DeepLearning.AI 创始人)10 条X:Arthur Mensch(Mistral CEO) (@arthurmensch)10 条X:Barret 李靖10 条X:Cursor (@cursor_ai)10 条X:Hao AI Lab10 条X:Kimi.ai10 条Tripo(官方 X)9 条X:Cognition (@cognition)9 条X:Fei-Fei Li9 条X:Manus (@ManusAI)9 条X:Figure AI (@Figure_robot)8 条X:Gemini Notebook (@Gemini_Notebook)8 条X:Higgsfield AI (@higgsfield)8 条X:Jeff Dean8 条X:Jim Fan8 条X:Lisa Su(AMD CEO) (@LisaSu)8 条X:Meshy (@MeshyAI)8 条X:MiniMax Design (H3) (@Hailuo_AI)8 条X:谢赛宁7 条X:Michael Truell7 条X:張小珺 Xiaojùn6 条X:NotebookLM0 条@berryxia · 历史来源430 条@vista8 · 历史来源262 条@op7418 · 历史来源231 条@google · 历史来源30 条@getsuperintel · 历史来源9 条@latentspacepod · 历史来源9 条@android · 历史来源8 条@dreamlabla · 历史来源8 条@mannybernabe · 历史来源8 条@karpathy · 历史来源7 条@alexatallah · 历史来源6 条@ryanleeminimax · 历史来源5 条@theo · 历史来源5 条@aidotengineer · 历史来源4 条@dkundel · 历史来源4 条@reach_vb · 历史来源4 条@dotey · 历史来源3 条@eliebakouch · 历史来源3 条@googlechrome · 历史来源3 条@kilocode · 历史来源3 条@maxforai · 历史来源3 条@newsfromgoogle · 历史来源3 条@richardssutton · 历史来源3 条@skylermiao7 · 历史来源3 条@victorsuortiz · 历史来源3 条@ajambrosino · 历史来源2 条@akashi203 · 历史来源2 条@anatolikopadze · 历史来源2 条@andrewcurran_ · 历史来源2 条@antirez · 历史来源2 条@barrnanas · 历史来源2 条@coreyching · 历史来源2 条@deanwball · 历史来源2 条@designarena · 历史来源2 条@fellmentke · 历史来源2 条@gergelyorosz · 历史来源2 条@gmi_cloud · 历史来源2 条@gravicle · 历史来源2 条@hxiao · 历史来源2 条@id_aa_carmack · 历史来源2 条@jackminong · 历史来源2 条@lennysan · 历史来源2 条@mada299 · 历史来源2 条@microsoft · 历史来源2 条@mikastars39 · 历史来源2 条@mitchellh · 历史来源2 条@nabeelqu · 历史来源2 条@rudrank · 历史来源2 条@sebastienbubeck · 历史来源2 条@zan2434 · 历史来源2 条@___harald___ · 历史来源1 条@_boraturan · 历史来源1 条@0xjaniak · 历史来源1 条@0xkato · 历史来源1 条@47fucb4r8c69323 · 历史来源1 条@559hkdt · 历史来源1 条@aaliya_va · 历史来源1 条@abhikatte42 · 历史来源1 条@abhishekpatiil · 历史来源1 条@aboutberlin · 历史来源1 条@addyosmani · 历史来源1 条@agi2asi · 历史来源1 条@aiaicreate · 历史来源1 条@aimlapi · 历史来源1 条@aisaonehq · 历史来源1 条@aisystemprompt · 历史来源1 条@alemtuzlak · 历史来源1 条@alexxubyte · 历史来源1 条@alupsasca · 历史来源1 条@amasad · 历史来源1 条@ampcode · 历史来源1 条@anas_build_ · 历史来源1 条@aniketmaurya · 历史来源1 条@anitakirkovska · 历史来源1 条@anneliesgamble · 历史来源1 条@antigravity · 历史来源1 条@arafatkatze · 历史来源1 条@argofowl · 历史来源1 条@ashiknewazaj · 历史来源1 条@atabarrok · 历史来源1 条@atomic_chat_hq · 历史来源1 条@awe_automation · 历史来源1 条@awesomekling · 历史来源1 条@awscloud · 历史来源1 条@ayushagarwal · 历史来源1 条@baaadas · 历史来源1 条@bai_agi · 历史来源1 条@bbuddha_xyz · 历史来源1 条@bclavie · 历史来源1 条@beccalytics · 历史来源1 条@benfleming__ · 历史来源1 条@benhylak · 历史来源1 条@benjamineyliu · 历史来源1 条@bfl_ml · 历史来源1 条@bleysg · 历史来源1 条@bolna_dev · 历史来源1 条@bosmeny · 历史来源1 条@boxmining · 历史来源1 条@bozhou_ai · 历史来源1 条@brexhq · 历史来源1 条@brian_armstrong · 历史来源1 条@brianchew · 历史来源1 条@bridgemindai · 历史来源1 条@budgetpixel · 历史来源1 条@cahidarda · 历史来源1 条@calmpromptshq · 历史来源1 条@ce_zhang · 历史来源1 条@cedric_chee · 历史来源1 条@chaitralikakde · 历史来源1 条@chatgpt · 历史来源1 条@chatgptapp · 历史来源1 条@christinetyip · 历史来源1 条@christofsalis · 历史来源1 条@clark__labs · 历史来源1 条@cloudflaredev · 历史来源1 条@cnorth_13 · 历史来源1 条@cnzoecomeback · 历史来源1 条@cocohearts · 历史来源1 条@code_star · 历史来源1 条@codebyaurelia · 历史来源1 条@cohavygal · 历史来源1 条@commandcodeai · 历史来源1 条@consensusnlp · 历史来源1 条@contralabs_ai · 历史来源1 条@cozyblaze265065 · 历史来源1 条@crimedecoder · 历史来源1 条@crtr0 · 历史来源1 条@damnventures · 历史来源1 条@daniellockyer · 历史来源1 条@darioamodei · 历史来源1 条@davidmaliglowka · 历史来源1 条@davidondrej1 · 历史来源1 条@davidsacks · 历史来源1 条@dbirker78883 · 历史来源1 条@deryatr_ · 历史来源1 条@devfun · 历史来源1 条@diegocabezas01 · 历史来源1 条@digitalocean · 历史来源1 条@dimillian · 历史来源1 条@dimitrispapail · 历史来源1 条@discussingfilm · 历史来源1 条@dkthomp · 历史来源1 条@dmitryrybin1 · 历史来源1 条@dmsobol · 历史来源1 条@douglance · 历史来源1 条@douglasyaody · 历史来源1 条@duckduckgo · 历史来源1 条@easyrouterio · 历史来源1 条@edgardobriban · 历史来源1 条@eisokant · 历史来源1 条@elliotarledge · 历史来源1 条@encrypted · 历史来源1 条@endpointarena · 历史来源1 条@envato · 历史来源1 条@escanorreloaded · 历史来源1 条@esrtweet · 历史来源1 条@ethanhe_42 · 历史来源1 条@eu_commission · 历史来源1 条@fba · 历史来源1 条@fdavidsont · 历史来源1 条@figmaweave · 历史来源1 条@finn_meeks · 历史来源1 条@first_tree_ai · 历史来源1 条@flavioad · 历史来源1 条@flowith · 历史来源1 条@fminzhou · 历史来源1 条@freddie_spirit · 历史来源1 条@frydwia · 历史来源1 条@futurestacked · 历史来源1 条@garrettlord · 历史来源1 条@garrytan · 历史来源1 条@gavinsbaker · 历史来源1 条@GayaniFigma · 历史来源1 条@genspark_ai · 历史来源1 条@gitlawb · 历史来源1 条@gneubig · 历史来源1 条@gokulr · 历史来源1 条@goodfireai · 历史来源1 条@goodnesmbakara · 历史来源1 条@googleaistudio · 历史来源1 条@gordic_aleksa · 历史来源1 条@gro_tsen · 历史来源1 条@hangsiin · 历史来源1 条@happycapyai · 历史来源1 条@haydenbleasel · 历史来源1 条@helloiamleonie · 历史来源1 条@hey_asiif · 历史来源1 条@hilbertspaess · 历史来源1 条@howtoprompt__ · 历史来源1 条@hq4ai · 历史来源1 条@hypersoren · 历史来源1 条@ianbremmer · 历史来源1 条@interaction · 历史来源1 条@intology · 历史来源1 条@iron_redux · 历史来源1 条@ithilgore · 历史来源1 条@itsreallyvivek · 历史来源1 条@jamesjyu · 历史来源1 条@jameszmsun · 历史来源1 条@jason_young1231 · 历史来源1 条@jawad_rahman_ · 历史来源1 条@jaydendavisnc · 历史来源1 条@jeffbarg · 历史来源1 条@jenzhuscott · 历史来源1 条@jiayuan_jy · 历史来源1 条@jilles · 历史来源1 条@jimcramer · 历史来源1 条@jimsyoung_ · 历史来源1 条@jinjingliang · 历史来源1 条@jjacky · 历史来源1 条@jjackyliang · 历史来源1 条@joefioti · 历史来源1 条@joi___ai · 历史来源1 条@joinhandshake · 历史来源1 条@joinpursuit · 历史来源1 条@joulee · 历史来源1 条@jsconfasia · 历史来源1 条@jsrailton · 历史来源1 条@juminoz · 历史来源1 条@kaizero_ainta · 历史来源1 条@karanganesan · 历史来源1 条@kdaigle · 历史来源1 条@kentherogers · 历史来源1 条@kevinsays · 历史来源1 条@khudonogov · 历史来源1 条@kinfisht · 历史来源1 条@koraykv · 历史来源1 条@kotekjedi_ml · 历史来源1 条@kuberwastaken · 历史来源1 条@kurz_gesagt · 历史来源1 条@kwindla · 历史来源1 条@lafalcemateo · 历史来源1 条@lakshyaaagrawal · 历史来源1 条@larrylv · 历史来源1 条@layoffai · 历史来源1 条@levinstanley · 历史来源1 条@lifeofjer · 历史来源1 条@livekit · 历史来源1 条@lon · 历史来源1 条@lostinlatencyx · 历史来源1 条@lotte_verheyden · 历史来源1 条@lqiao · 历史来源1 条@luciushq · 历史来源1 条@luckeyfaraday · 历史来源1 条@lukaspet · 历史来源1 条@madhavsinghal_ · 历史来源1 条@manassharmahere · 历史来源1 条@markiewagner · 历史来源1 条@marksaroufim · 历史来源1 条@marsxiang_ · 历史来源1 条@maseehg_ · 历史来源1 条@mattshumer_ · 历史来源1 条@mem0ai · 历史来源1 条@mengto · 历史来源1 条@merettm · 历史来源1 条@micahcarroll · 历史来源1 条@michael_chomsky · 历史来源1 条@michaelarnaldi · 历史来源1 条@microsoftai · 历史来源1 条@mike_acton · 历史来源1 条@mikeyyyzhao · 历史来源1 条@minchoi · 历史来源1 条@minimaxagent · 历史来源1 条@minu_who · 历史来源1 条@mkbhd · 历史来源1 条@modal · 历史来源1 条@moritzthuening · 历史来源1 条@moxie · 历史来源1 条@mstockton · 历史来源1 条@mtslive · 历史来源1 条@multimodalart · 历史来源1 条@neelnanda5 · 历史来源1 条@neilrahilly · 历史来源1 条@nickbaumann_ · 历史来源1 条@nirantk · 历史来源1 条@noemititarenco · 历史来源1 条@notjazii · 历史来源1 条@nousresearch · 历史来源1 条@oblomovius · 历史来源1 条@ollama · 历史来源1 条@onlyterp · 历史来源1 条@onlyzhynx · 历史来源1 条@organicgpt · 历史来源1 条@orgrem · 历史来源1 条@p0 · 历史来源1 条@palantirtech · 历史来源1 条@palmerluckey · 历史来源1 条@pandatalk8 · 历史来源1 条@parishilton · 历史来源1 条@patrickcarlyle · 历史来源1 条@patricktoulme · 历史来源1 条@paulg · 历史来源1 条@paulsolt · 历史来源1 条@pbdtokenrouter · 历史来源1 条@pererabinoy · 历史来源1 条@philhchen · 历史来源1 条@pirroh · 历史来源1 条@pjaccetturo · 历史来源1 条@postlive · 历史来源1 条@pranaveight · 历史来源1 条@prathamdby · 历史来源1 条@prince_canuma · 历史来源1 条@pumpkherm · 历史来源1 条@pvncher · 历史来源1 条@qiaoqiao2001 · 历史来源1 条@rajveerbach · 历史来源1 条@randyhaddad6 · 历史来源1 条@rauchg · 历史来源1 条@raveeshbhalla · 历史来源1 条@rayanpal_ · 历史来源1 条@rayfernando1337 · 历史来源1 条@redpoint · 历史来源1 条@ric_rtp · 历史来源1 条@richardsocher · 历史来源1 条@riderashgame · 历史来源1 条@rileybrown · 历史来源1 条@robertvaradan · 历史来源1 条@ronshepherd · 历史来源1 条@rosmine · 历史来源1 条@rthiago · 历史来源1 条@ruben_kostard · 历史来源1 条@runware · 历史来源1 条@rvivek · 历史来源1 条@ryanjunejo · 历史来源1 条@safaricheung · 历史来源1 条@samuelstroschei · 历史来源1 条@sanmking · 历史来源1 条@saranormous · 历史来源1 条@savinovnikolay · 历史来源1 条@scale_ai · 历史来源1 条@scaling01 · 历史来源1 条@sdaily_ai · 历史来源1 条@secscottbessent · 历史来源1 条@seltaa_ · 历史来源1 条@sergiopaniego · 历史来源1 条@servasyy_ai · 历史来源1 条@sethltx · 历史来源1 条@sharat_sc · 历史来源1 条@shashankgoyal95 · 历史来源1 条@sherryyanjiang · 历史来源1 条@sherylhsu02 · 历史来源1 条@shl · 历史来源1 条@sighjith · 历史来源1 条@simistern · 历史来源1 条@southpkcommons · 历史来源1 条@sriramkri · 历史来源1 条@sshoaibali · 历史来源1 条@stalkermustang · 历史来源1 条@status_effects · 历史来源1 条@stevencheng · 历史来源1 条@stockanalystpro · 历史来源1 条@suekhim · 历史来源1 条@sultanalfardan · 历史来源1 条@suraj_sharma14 · 历史来源1 条@swisscheese4299 · 历史来源1 条@swmansion · 历史来源1 条@systematicls · 历史来源1 条@teksedge · 历史来源1 条@tftc21 · 历史来源1 条@theahmadosman · 历史来源1 条@themidasproj · 历史来源1 条@theonejvo · 历史来源1 条@therealadamg · 历史来源1 条@timsoulo · 历史来源1 条@tmuxvim · 历史来源1 条@tobi · 历史来源1 条@togethercompute · 历史来源1 条@trackernetwork · 历史来源1 条@trustkerneltech · 历史来源1 条@ttunguz · 历史来源1 条@tuhinchakr · 历史来源1 条@twistartups · 历史来源1 条@ubermenscchh · 历史来源1 条@udayan_w · 历史来源1 条@usefastlane · 历史来源1 条@uzyn · 历史来源1 条@valeriocapraro · 历史来源1 条@vasuman · 历史来源1 条@vdbergrianne · 历史来源1 条@vibeguessing · 历史来源1 条@victoriakimse · 历史来源1 条@victoriawu77 · 历史来源1 条@victortaelin · 历史来源1 条@vikaskansalhq · 历史来源1 条@volchika · 历史来源1 条@walden_yan · 历史来源1 条@warpdotdev · 历史来源1 条@waynesutton · 历史来源1 条@wesroth · 历史来源1 条@whosamberella · 历史来源1 条@xdinodeer · 历史来源1 条@xicilion · 历史来源1 条@xucian_ · 历史来源1 条@yacinemtb · 历史来源1 条@yaojingang · 历史来源1 条@yevr19 · 历史来源1 条@yoheinakajima · 历史来源1 条@yongquanyq · 历史来源1 条@youtubejocoding · 历史来源1 条@yusufg · 历史来源1 条@zachbussey · 历史来源1 条@zeddotdev · 历史来源1 条@zeroxkyle · 历史来源1 条@zhenthebuilder · 历史来源1 条@zicohacks · 历史来源1 条@zixuanli_ · 历史来源1 条@zymazza · 历史来源1 条
19,009 条AI 相关新闻 · 最新在前
9月12日周六
  1. @rohanpaul_ai32

    https://t.co/EqPji8ltl6

    引用@rohanpaul_ai@rohanpaul_ai

    Interesting discussion on "Peter H. Diamandis" (@PeterDiamandis ) Moonshot podcast on ex-Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon super-viral tweet of AI being a risk to human life. "a doomer who's an AI researcher who's only been there for 3 months, comes out and gets 300 million views. Their relevance as an AI researcher is about to go away. So, they're very dangerous people because the purpose that they've been working toward for a long time is about to get automated away. Meanwhile, all the white-collar and blue-collar workers who they said were going to be automated away are fine. So, they actually self-destructed themselves, and now they're very, very dangerous people. somebody comes out and says, "Therefore, stop." You're like, "You're an idiot. That is not an answer. It's not going to stop. Get it through your head that it's not going to stop." There has to be a practical, real-world way to get that P(doom) down to zero. And there is." ---- From "Peter H. Diamandis" (@PeterDiamandis ) YouTube channel, (full video link in comment)

  2. @rohanpaul_ai31

    https://t.co/XWW3xKKoTg

    引用@rohanpaul_ai@rohanpaul_ai

    "Who is behind all of this negativity? Is it coordinated? Where is the money coming from? The Economist is out with a story just this week that, despite all the doomers, who said 10% of all jobs would have gone away by now, in fact, AI has created a million new jobs in America. We learn that all of this catastrophizing about data centers may, in fact, have had support from the CCP. So I want a little investigation. Who is behind all of this negativity? Is it coordinated? Where is the money coming from?" - Brad Gerstner (@altcap ), Founder and CEO of Altimeter Capital on CNBC Television ---- From "CNBC Television" YouTube channel, (full video link in comment)

  3. @rohanpaul_ai29

    https://t.co/EqPji8ltl6

    引用@rohanpaul_ai@rohanpaul_ai

    Interesting discussion on "Peter H. Diamandis" (@PeterDiamandis ) Moonshot podcast on ex-Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon super-viral tweet of AI being a risk to human life. "a doomer who's an AI researcher who's only been there for 3 months, comes out and gets 300 million views. Their relevance as an AI researcher is about to go away. So, they're very dangerous people because the purpose that they've been working toward for a long time is about to get automated away. Meanwhile, all the white-collar and blue-collar workers who they said were going to be automated away are fine. So, they actually self-destructed themselves, and now they're very, very dangerous people. somebody comes out and says, "Therefore, stop." You're like, "You're an idiot. That is not an answer. It's not going to stop. Get it through your head that it's not going to stop." There has to be a practical, real-world way to get that P(doom) down to zero. And there is." ---- From "Peter H. Diamandis" (@PeterDiamandis ) YouTube channel, (full video link in comment)

  4. @rohanpaul_ai49

    https://t.co/GRUctTprra

    引用@rohanpaul_ai@rohanpaul_ai

    David Sacks just dismantled the narrative behind Jacob Coxon’s 166M+ view tweet, the ex-Anthropic and OpenAI researcher who resigned. it was a planned “doomer op.” "This is an X account that had almost no activity, almost no followers, and no posts prior to this resignation tweetstorm. If he did have prior posts, they were scrubbed. So, this was a completely blank account, and somehow, within a day, it finds this huge audience. Elon has said it never happened before. And we also know who amplified it in the first 15 minutes. So, there were basically 3 of these well-organized, well-funded doomer groups who amplified it. ... This is a tight-knit community that jumped on this tweet. This was not some spontaneous act by an employee who said, “Oh, I’m just going to post my resignation letter on Twitter.” This was something that was orchestrated. And then, just the final piece of evidence on this point is that someone looked at the Wall Street Journal story that covered the resignation letter, and somehow it was posted minutes before the tweetstorm itself." ---- From "All-In Podcast" YouTube channel, (full video link in comment)

  5. @rohanpaul_ai31

    https://t.co/XWW3xKKoTg

    引用@rohanpaul_ai@rohanpaul_ai

    "Who is behind all of this negativity? Is it coordinated? Where is the money coming from? The Economist is out with a story just this week that, despite all the doomers, who said 10% of all jobs would have gone away by now, in fact, AI has created a million new jobs in America. We learn that all of this catastrophizing about data centers may, in fact, have had support from the CCP. So I want a little investigation. Who is behind all of this negativity? Is it coordinated? Where is the money coming from?" - Brad Gerstner (@altcap ), Founder and CEO of Altimeter Capital on CNBC Television ---- From "CNBC Television" YouTube channel, (full video link in comment)

  6. @rohanpaul_ai44

    https://t.co/GRUctTprra

    引用@rohanpaul_ai@rohanpaul_ai

    David Sacks just dismantled the narrative behind Jacob Coxon’s 166M+ view tweet, the ex-Anthropic and OpenAI researcher who resigned. it was a planned “doomer op.” "This is an X account that had almost no activity, almost no followers, and no posts prior to this resignation tweetstorm. If he did have prior posts, they were scrubbed. So, this was a completely blank account, and somehow, within a day, it finds this huge audience. Elon has said it never happened before. And we also know who amplified it in the first 15 minutes. So, there were basically 3 of these well-organized, well-funded doomer groups who amplified it. ... This is a tight-knit community that jumped on this tweet. This was not some spontaneous act by an employee who said, “Oh, I’m just going to post my resignation letter on Twitter.” This was something that was orchestrated. And then, just the final piece of evidence on this point is that someone looked at the Wall Street Journal story that covered the resignation letter, and somehow it was posted minutes before the tweetstorm itself." ---- From "All-In Podcast" YouTube channel, (full video link in comment)

  7. @rohanpaul_ai37

    https://t.co/EqPji8ltl6

    引用@rohanpaul_ai@rohanpaul_ai

    Interesting discussion on "Peter H. Diamandis" (@PeterDiamandis ) Moonshot podcast on ex-Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon super-viral tweet of AI being a risk to human life. "a doomer who's an AI researcher who's only been there for 3 months, comes out and gets 300 million views. Their relevance as an AI researcher is about to go away. So, they're very dangerous people because the purpose that they've been working toward for a long time is about to get automated away. Meanwhile, all the white-collar and blue-collar workers who they said were going to be automated away are fine. So, they actually self-destructed themselves, and now they're very, very dangerous people. somebody comes out and says, "Therefore, stop." You're like, "You're an idiot. That is not an answer. It's not going to stop. Get it through your head that it's not going to stop." There has to be a practical, real-world way to get that P(doom) down to zero. And there is." ---- From "Peter H. Diamandis" (@PeterDiamandis ) YouTube channel, (full video link in comment)

  8. @rohanpaul_ai47

    https://t.co/GRUctTprra

    引用@rohanpaul_ai@rohanpaul_ai

    David Sacks just dismantled the narrative behind Jacob Coxon’s 166M+ view tweet, the ex-Anthropic and OpenAI researcher who resigned. it was a planned “doomer op.” "This is an X account that had almost no activity, almost no followers, and no posts prior to this resignation tweetstorm. If he did have prior posts, they were scrubbed. So, this was a completely blank account, and somehow, within a day, it finds this huge audience. Elon has said it never happened before. And we also know who amplified it in the first 15 minutes. So, there were basically 3 of these well-organized, well-funded doomer groups who amplified it. ... This is a tight-knit community that jumped on this tweet. This was not some spontaneous act by an employee who said, “Oh, I’m just going to post my resignation letter on Twitter.” This was something that was orchestrated. And then, just the final piece of evidence on this point is that someone looked at the Wall Street Journal story that covered the resignation letter, and somehow it was posted minutes before the tweetstorm itself." ---- From "All-In Podcast" YouTube channel, (full video link in comment)

  9. @rohanpaul_ai45

    https://t.co/GRUctTprra

    引用@rohanpaul_ai@rohanpaul_ai

    David Sacks just dismantled the narrative behind Jacob Coxon’s 166M+ view tweet, the ex-Anthropic and OpenAI researcher who resigned. it was a planned “doomer op.” "This is an X account that had almost no activity, almost no followers, and no posts prior to this resignation tweetstorm. If he did have prior posts, they were scrubbed. So, this was a completely blank account, and somehow, within a day, it finds this huge audience. Elon has said it never happened before. And we also know who amplified it in the first 15 minutes. So, there were basically 3 of these well-organized, well-funded doomer groups who amplified it. ... This is a tight-knit community that jumped on this tweet. This was not some spontaneous act by an employee who said, “Oh, I’m just going to post my resignation letter on Twitter.” This was something that was orchestrated. And then, just the final piece of evidence on this point is that someone looked at the Wall Street Journal story that covered the resignation letter, and somehow it was posted minutes before the tweetstorm itself." ---- From "All-In Podcast" YouTube channel, (full video link in comment)

  10. @rohanpaul_ai54

    Rohan Paul 转发 All-In Podcast 片段,David Sacks 在片段中称前 Anthropic、OpenAI 研究员 Jacob Coxon 那条浏览量超 166M 的辞职推文是一次有组织策划的“doomer op”。他指出该账号在辞职推文之前几乎没有活动、没有粉丝、也没有历史帖子,却在一天内获得大量关注,并被三个组织化团体在前 15 分钟内放大。他还提到,有人查看《华尔街日报》关于辞职信的报道后,发现它在该推文风暴之前几分钟就已发布。

    引用@rohanpaul_ai@rohanpaul_ai

    David Sacks just dismantled the narrative behind Jacob Coxon’s 166M+ view tweet, the ex-Anthropic and OpenAI researcher who resigned. it was a planned “doomer op.” "This is an X account that had almost no activity, almost no followers, and no posts prior to this resignation tweetstorm. If he did have prior posts, they were scrubbed. So, this was a completely blank account, and somehow, within a day, it finds this huge audience. Elon has said it never happened before. And we also know who amplified it in the first 15 minutes. So, there were basically 3 of these well-organized, well-funded doomer groups who amplified it. ... This is a tight-knit community that jumped on this tweet. This was not some spontaneous act by an employee who said, “Oh, I’m just going to post my resignation letter on Twitter.” This was something that was orchestrated. And then, just the final piece of evidence on this point is that someone looked at the Wall Street Journal story that covered the resignation letter, and somehow it was posted minutes before the tweetstorm itself." ---- From "All-In Podcast" YouTube channel, (full video link in comment)

  11. @rohanpaul_ai47

    https://t.co/GRUctTprra

    引用@rohanpaul_ai@rohanpaul_ai

    David Sacks just dismantled the narrative behind Jacob Coxon’s 166M+ view tweet, the ex-Anthropic and OpenAI researcher who resigned. it was a planned “doomer op.” "This is an X account that had almost no activity, almost no followers, and no posts prior to this resignation tweetstorm. If he did have prior posts, they were scrubbed. So, this was a completely blank account, and somehow, within a day, it finds this huge audience. Elon has said it never happened before. And we also know who amplified it in the first 15 minutes. So, there were basically 3 of these well-organized, well-funded doomer groups who amplified it. ... This is a tight-knit community that jumped on this tweet. This was not some spontaneous act by an employee who said, “Oh, I’m just going to post my resignation letter on Twitter.” This was something that was orchestrated. And then, just the final piece of evidence on this point is that someone looked at the Wall Street Journal story that covered the resignation letter, and somehow it was posted minutes before the tweetstorm itself." ---- From "All-In Podcast" YouTube channel, (full video link in comment)

  12. @rohanpaul_ai51

    David Sacks 在 All-In Podcast 上称,前 Anthropic 与 OpenAI 研究员 Jacob Coxon 那篇浏览量超 1.66 亿的辞职推文是一次有计划的 doomer 舆论操作。他给出的理由包括该 X 账号在辞职推文前几乎没有活跃、没有粉丝、也没有帖子,却在一天内获得大量关注,另有 3 个组织良好、资金充足的 doomer 群体在前 15 分钟内转发放大。他还提到,报道这封辞职信的《华尔街日报》文章在该推文之前几分钟就已发布。

    引用@rohanpaul_ai@rohanpaul_ai

    David Sacks just dismantled the narrative behind Jacob Coxon’s 166M+ view tweet, the ex-Anthropic and OpenAI researcher who resigned. it was a planned “doomer op.” "This is an X account that had almost no activity, almost no followers, and no posts prior to this resignation tweetstorm. If he did have prior posts, they were scrubbed. So, this was a completely blank account, and somehow, within a day, it finds this huge audience. Elon has said it never happened before. And we also know who amplified it in the first 15 minutes. So, there were basically 3 of these well-organized, well-funded doomer groups who amplified it. ... This is a tight-knit community that jumped on this tweet. This was not some spontaneous act by an employee who said, “Oh, I’m just going to post my resignation letter on Twitter.” This was something that was orchestrated. And then, just the final piece of evidence on this point is that someone looked at the Wall Street Journal story that covered the resignation letter, and somehow it was posted minutes before the tweetstorm itself." ---- From "All-In Podcast" YouTube channel, (full video link in comment)

  13. @rohanpaul_ai49

    David Sacks 指前 Anthropic 和 OpenAI 研究员 Jacob Coxon 获 1.66 亿+ 浏览的辞职推文是一场有组织的"doomer op"。该账号此前几乎无活动、无粉丝、无帖子,却在一天内获得巨大关注,且《华尔街日报》相关报道在推文发布前几分钟就已上线。Sacks 称有 3 个组织良好、资金充足的 doomer 团体在推文发布后 15 分钟内进行了放大传播。

    原始视频预览图;未保存可播放视频URL
    引用@rohanpaul_ai@rohanpaul_ai

    Jacob Coxon's next interview on CBS News (ex Anthropic+Open AI researcher who resigned) "We can't just unplug it because it could be copying itself over to other computers. Like it's not that difficult to find yourself because an AI is just code. It could transfer itself over the internet to a different place and then you unplug it here, but it's actually still over there and maybe it makes 10,000 copies of itself and they're all cooperating." ---- From "CBS News" YouTube channel, (full video link in comment)

  14. @AYi_AInotes37

    阿易 AI Notes 提炼吴恩达长文中的「6 句灵魂自检」,供开发者自测是否仍停留在传统搬砖层:能否主动定迭代方向、无需求文档时几小时内交出可验证最小原型、近期是否接触真实用户或核心转化数据、能否用非技术语言讲清商业逻辑、是否主动发起有业务价值的事、以及以任务数还是可感知价值衡量一天。若 4 个以上答不上来,说明尚未跳出传统层。

  15. @AYi_AInotes47

    吴恩达基于 10,000 多份真实岗位分析发布《AI Engineering Skills Map》第四根支柱"Shaping the Build(塑造构建)",提出工程师应主动影响做什么并驱动构建循环。该支柱包含四项能力:成为构建循环的驾驶员、补齐需求空白并具备产品与商业直觉、穿透非技术部门的跨界领导力、高能动性的所有权。其核心判断是写代码的边际成本已趋近于零,选对问题与对结果负责才是稀缺能力。

    引用@AndrewYNg@AndrewYNg

    With AI Engineering skills, you actively shape the build: You influence what gets built, and drive the build loop. Here're key skills to do this. https://t.co/sysOYdzuZY

  16. @SemiAnalysis_55

    SemiAnalysis 在二季度数据中心产业走访中发现,模块化产能已售罄,需求增速超过产能爬坡速度。模块化因同时缓解工期与现场劳动力两大制约而提升份额,电力与冷却系统可在工厂组装、外壳在现场同步搭建,交付周期最多压缩 40%,部分建设环节的现场工时最多减少约 70%。相关内容在其近期 newsletter 中拆解了不同方案及工期、人力与成本节省。

  17. @rohanpaul_ai74

    据 Reuters 报道,Nvidia 正考虑以 $10B 作为锚定投资者参与 Anthropic 估值 $2T 的 IPO,该发行最多可募资 $100B,但谈判尚未完成且可能变化。锚定投资者会在面向更广泛市场推广前先行认购。对 Nvidia 来说,这笔投资即便 Anthropic 股价表现不佳,也有助于其卖出更多芯片。

    推荐理由:Reuters 报道透露 Nvidia 拟以 10 亿美元锚定投资参与 Anthropic 的 IPO,可据此了解算力厂商与模型公司之间的资本绑定逻辑。