X
关注 AI 研究者、开发者与机构的动态
按账号或来源筛选(539)
@rohanpaul_ai@rohanpaul_aiAI 评分2020 
@AISafetyMemes@AISafetyMemesAI 评分1313 这是第一个 Skynet Day(8 月 29 日),这件事真的有可能正在世界某个地方发生 https://t.co/fUmKyAFUtQ
@elonmusk@elonmuskAI 评分66 @elonmusk@elonmuskAI 评分4242 Grok @Bot 买了一辆特斯拉!https://t.co/4EgsRIzPGw
引用@cb_doge@cb_dogeGrok Bot can literally buy things for you on the internet now. Here’s a wild example: @Baconbrix asked Grok Bot to buy him a Tesla, and it actually placed the order for a Model Y. Grok Bot is getting insanely powerful. 🚀 https://t.co/pkZ56YwhmX
@rohanpaul_ai@rohanpaul_aiAI 评分2828 
@elonmusk@elonmuskAI 评分44 @AISafetyMemes@AISafetyMemesAI 评分1111 我们被一场神秘的智能体大规模灭绝拯救了 https://t.co/OGcVc1LqhD https://t.co/u7cWNPJ7RZ

@cb_doge@cb_dogeAI 评分5454 
@AYi_AInotes@AYi_AInotesAI 评分2020 @AYi_AInotes@AYi_AInotesAI 评分2929 
@rohanpaul_ai@rohanpaul_aiAI 评分1414 @rohanpaul_ai@rohanpaul_aiAI 评分3939 
@cb_doge@cb_dogeAI 评分3535 ELON MUSK:“发电是AI的制约因素。人们低估了电力上线的难度。你得把电压转换成计算机能消化的形式。你得给机器降温。” https://t.co/0738yVinVw

@emollick@emollickAI 评分2525 @emollick@emollickAI 评分2424 刚翻了几位我最喜欢的硬科幻作家的网页,哇,他们大多数人讨厌 LLM:其中相当多的人是因为觉得它是个没用的随机鹦鹉,一些是因为 IP 问题,少数是因为存在性风险。
@cb_doge@cb_dogeAI 评分4646 
@rohanpaul_ai@rohanpaul_aiAI 评分2323 @rohanpaul_ai@rohanpaul_aiAI 评分4545 
@kimmonismus@kimmonismusAI 评分2626 天呐,连续两周每周重置。 到这一步,几乎不可能这么快烧完我的额度了。祝大家好运。https://t.co/BpNjSC6yXU
引用@thsottiaux@thsottiauxThis celebration is moved to tomorrow as the button was already pressed today. https://t.co/lAywb9TV44
@trackernetwork · XAI 评分2222 基于《GTA 6》扩展预告片构建语义搜索的 Show HN 项目
有开发者在 Hacker News 的 Show HN 板块展示了一个针对《GTA 6》扩展预告片(GTA 6 Extended Look)的语义搜索功能,该内容来自其 Twitter 分享链接。目前该帖在 HN 上获得 1 个积分。
@thsottiaux@thsottiauxAI 评分1616 引用@thsottiaux@thsottiauxLooking at the dashboard we might hit a new milestone to celebrate tomorrow. Hold on to your Codex
@elonmusk@elonmuskAI 评分4242 共识估计是,2027年生产出的约15GW AI算力无法在2027年投入使用。 这比单纯找电力更难,因为你还需要建设所有变压器、布线、液冷、(大型)冷水机组以及复杂的网络。
@rohanpaul_ai@rohanpaul_aiAI 评分5959 马斯克表示 SpaceX 和 Tesla 正各自建设每年 100GW 的太阳能产能,同时 SpaceX 计划在内部自建涡轮叶片铸造厂,使天然气涡轮机上线时间最多提前 18 个月。

@kimmonismus@kimmonismusAI 评分6060 引用@thsottiaux@thsottiauxWe are reseting usage for all paid users of Codex and ChatGPT Work. Please continue reading for an update on Codex usage limits. The team has been working around the clock, going through thousands of reports and shipping fixes. Depending on how you use Codex, you should see your usage go between 10% and 50% further than before. We really went with a fine comb, with many uncovered small things being longstanding and here is what we found and fixed: - Compaction. We were keeping old images during compaction, sometimes making the context large enough to trigger compaction again. After the fix, usage dropped around 10% for users making heavy use of images. Fixed. - Memory. Background memory workers could inherit Stop hooks and keep running when the hook wouldn’t let them finish. This affected fewer than 1% of users, with the long tail being pretty bad and we saw one example thread check whether it could stop 15,000 times. Fixed. - Goals. In some cases, a set /goal could finish and then keep going past the intended stop condition, or the model would keep retrying broken tools without stopping. We saw examples consume anywhere from 15% to 70% of a weekly allowance. Fixed. - Automations. Some custom schedules could run more frequently than configured. Fixed. - Subagents. Smaller models (e.g. Luna) sometimes picked more capable helpers without being explicitly asked. The same was true where the orchestrating model not running in /fast mode could request sub-agents to run /fast. Fixed. - Computer History. The older implementation could lead to repeatedly summarizing overlapping activity. For some cases we saw it consume up to one fifth of the weekly usage per week. Fixed. - Rolling task summaries. Ordinary turns were triggering extra background requests. These added about 1% to token usage. Small each time, but it adds up. We have disabled this. - MCP. Some tool results could be encoded twice. We also found tool instructions getting cut off and fetched again. Fixed. We’ve also made architectural changes to prevent these from regressing and our teams will get paged if it happens regardless. We are also working on showing you directly in the app where your usage goes so you don’t have to guess. Goes without saying that we’re resetting usage limits and I hope you enjoy a very nice Saturday!
@testingcatalog@testingcatalog精选AI 评分6767 
引用@thsottiaux@thsottiauxWe are reseting usage for all paid users of Codex and ChatGPT Work. Please continue reading for an update on Codex usage limits. The team has been working around the clock, going through thousands of reports and shipping fixes. Depending on how you use Codex, you should see your usage go between 10% and 50% further than before. We really went with a fine comb, with many uncovered small things being longstanding and here is what we found and fixed: - Compaction. We were keeping old images during compaction, sometimes making the context large enough to trigger compaction again. After the fix, usage dropped around 10% for users making heavy use of images. Fixed. - Memory. Background memory workers could inherit Stop hooks and keep running when the hook wouldn’t let them finish. This affected fewer than 1% of users, with the long tail being pretty bad and we saw one example thread check whether it could stop 15,000 times. Fixed. - Goals. In some cases, a set /goal could finish and then keep going past the intended stop condition, or the model would keep retrying broken tools without stopping. We saw examples consume anywhere from 15% to 70% of a weekly allowance. Fixed. - Automations. Some custom schedules could run more frequently than configured. Fixed. - Subagents. Smaller models (e.g. Luna) sometimes picked more capable helpers without being explicitly asked. The same was true where the orchestrating model not running in /fast mode could request sub-agents to run /fast. Fixed. - Computer History. The older implementation could lead to repeatedly summarizing overlapping activity. For some cases we saw it consume up to one fifth of the weekly usage per week. Fixed. - Rolling task summaries. Ordinary turns were triggering extra background requests. These added about 1% to token usage. Small each time, but it adds up. We have disabled this. - MCP. Some tool results could be encoded twice. We also found tool instructions getting cut off and fetched again. Fixed. We’ve also made architectural changes to prevent these from regressing and our teams will get paged if it happens regardless. We are also working on showing you directly in the app where your usage goes so you don’t have to guess. Goes without saying that we’re resetting usage limits and I hope you enjoy a very nice Saturday!
推荐理由:原文逐项列出八类用量异常的原因与修复结果,读者可据此判断 Codex 付费额度实际能多用多少。
@elonmusk@elonmuskAI 评分66 @thsottiaux@thsottiauxAI 评分55 @thsottiaux@thsottiauxAI 评分6060 OpenAI 为 Codex 和 ChatGPT Work 所有付费用户重置用量上限,并修复多处导致 token 消耗偏高的问题,按使用方式不同,用量可比之前多用 10% 到 50%。
@fofrAI@fofrAIAI 评分2121 顺便说一句,到目前为止,我还未能通过纯文本提示词或图像提示词,让任何视频模型生成出Ames错觉。https://t.co/w281P4i0TQ
@cb_doge@cb_dogeAI 评分4343 
@rohanpaul_ai@rohanpaul_aiAI 评分5252 
@rohanpaul_ai@rohanpaul_aiAI 评分4343 
@SemiAnalysis_@SemiAnalysis_AI 评分2626
引用@gdb@gdbJevons Paradox is counterintuitive and inspiring https://t.co/11gDqcCfGV
@cb_doge@cb_dogeAI 评分2222 
@elonmusk@elonmuskAI 评分1010 @omarsar0@omarsar0AI 评分4040 
@kimmonismus@kimmonismusAI 评分2323 
@thsottiaux@thsottiaux精选AI 评分7272 引用@mntruell@mntruellWe’re sorry to see that OpenAI put out a note saying they plan to block Cursor users from accessing OpenAI models in three months. OpenAI models serve about 5% of Cursor user traffic, and we’re speaking with the OpenAI team to resolve this. Cursor was one of the very first users of OpenAI, we’ve worked closely with their team for years, and we’ve trusted their platform to be neutral infrastructure for our business.
推荐理由:OpenAI 员工反驳 Cursor 给出的 5% 流量占比,提出 token 用量不等同收入与价值,可供理解这场分歧。
@MiniMax_AI@MiniMax_AIAI 评分3636 @kimmonismus@kimmonismusAI 评分3838 